Wow, this post is even worse.
I see. So he opted to put Julio Gonzalez on PPV instead. And he did better numbers with Gonzalez than he did in the all of his previous pay-per-views except Toney: including Pazienza, Grffin, Harding, etc.
We're done here as far as this debate. Until you can actually pinpoint when Gonzalez went from green to decent (like you actually watched his fights between Jones and Michalchewski), I'd advise you to leave it alone.
I'm not sure where all this is coming from. How is any of this relevant to what I said? And I'm the one in love with Jones?
Get out of here! Is that what happened?!?!? I had NO IDEA!!!
LMAO @ this hater. Thanks for the laughs.
Actually, I never mentioned where I thought Jones stands historically. Actually, I merely brought up something in regards to Julio Gonzalez. But you're so MAD - lmao - that you're just throwing the whole book at me.
Funny how the haters don't realize that they, in actuality, are the real nuthuggers.
RJJ couldnt have too many PPVs because the public wasnt buying it . RJJ and HBO were doing nothing more than never ending Showcase fights. Its hard to sell PPVs when your fighting nobodys like Derrick Harmon, Glen Kelly,
Richard Hall,David Telesco.
Richard Hall,David Telesco.
When talking about this Gonzalez fight, Im looking back in hindsight. Like ive said: Gonzalez was a green 23 year old pro with a 27-0 record, who beat mostly nobodys with losing records. At that point hadnt beat anything close to a big name. Looking at Gonzalez career as whole now, he turned out to be a decent fighter at best. Years later he won the WBO belt.
I give him credit from the few good names he has had faced and beat.
To this day you have to go all the way back to 1993 to get Jones best wins. The Hopkins fight was a good win for the time. Hopkins was far from his best and didnt hit the p4p list untill years later. Actully its probably his best win, to this day people still talk about his boring close decision from 1993. The Toney win in 1994 was good, too bad Jones never accepted the rematch. Also you could say a Hopkins rematch should have happend, but Jones priced him self out.
To this day you have to go all the way back to 1993 to get Jones best wins. The Hopkins fight was a good win for the time. Hopkins was far from his best and didnt hit the p4p list untill years later. Actully its probably his best win, to this day people still talk about his boring close decision from 1993. The Toney win in 1994 was good, too bad Jones never accepted the rematch. Also you could say a Hopkins rematch should have happend, but Jones priced him self out.
Lets not forget that Taver beat him IMO 3 times. One of which he got KTFO. Also when finally fighting another good fighter in Johnson he got KTFO and couldnt even leave the ring under his own power.
Many people gave Jones credit for beating Glen Kelly. Using the gif as a example of Jones "greatness". Woods is a decent fighter at best, like ive been saying. Then in hindsight lost all his big fights. So what does that make him? Nothing great, IMO subpar. So a win over him means? Another mediocre fighter beat.
Its obvious you love Jones and nothing will ever sway your vote. Your mind has been made up for years hes great. Im not a Jones hater, ive said he was good. But the question to this thread was where he is ALL TIME. Your guys are talking top 5,10 of ALL TIME. No way in hell. This isnt a question of "what he could have done", his great genetics, his great hand speed. Were talking what he actully did in the ring, not all the hype. Not who you THINK he could beat. Who he really fought and beat. Jones could have been top 20 but he never missed an opportunity to miss an opportunity.
Funny how the haters don't realize that they, in actuality, are the real nuthuggers.

Comment