what would have happened if vitali-lummox fight had continued?
Collapse
-
-
ok maybe not bum but overrated fighterI read a lot of insanely crazy stuff on here every time I visit and let it pass, but this is patently absurd. I was never a fan of Lewis, but to intimate that he was a "bum" is -put into Don King-speak - "Ludicrosity of the high-ess of bias!!"
Furthermore, speculation as to what the outcome would have been had the fight continued is nothing more than just that- speculation.Comment
-
-
Comment
-
-
i looked for where you said that and to my surprised you changed the post, i searched the thread and got the heading of what you said
"For me this is a total no brainer. If you do your research the way you're supposed to - BoxRec - you'll see that Robinson lost 19 of his bouts. Floyd hasn't lost one yet, nor come close to losing, so..."
but you changed your post so i couldnt read it all. im sure if you read the this little bit of what i found. you were intimating that floyd is better than ray robinson and by your logic seeing as ray robinson lost 19 fights and tye fields has lost one does that make him better than ray robinson.
now who is the ******.
Comment
-
'You really believe that? Who did he cheat? He didn't rematch vitali because he stopped him. I liked vitali, but his eye was going to get worse and worse.Comment
-
I think both Klitschkos are very good fighters, but what a bunch of horse ****. Where to begin?:
#1. Lets not pretend you wouldn't have given ALL THE CREDIT IN THE WORLD to Vitali had he beat an OLD LENNOX LEWIS
#2. If beating old fighters is so easy, how can you possibly excuse Vitali losing to an old Lewis?
#3. Lewis did beat Vitali. This cannot be contested. Its a fact, and cutting a man's face up via punches is a universally accepted way to win bouts (be it in the eyes of fans, ring doctors, referees, sanctioning organizations, and athletic commissions)
#4. Landing enough leather to severely **** up Vitali's face is not "lucky".
#5. Its not cheating to beat up older fighters.
#6. Lewis was himself an older fighter when he was beating up many of those older fighters.
#7. The drunken gamblers in the audience are not the arbiters of victory and defeat. If this were the case, one would have to conclude Ricky Hatton beat Floyd Mayweather. Listen to the crowd!Comment
-
Comment
-
no but this was a neutral crowd, im not saying it determines who wins and loses, but vitali was doing great and winning the fight and the crowd responded accordingly . its cheating to headbutt a guy and cut him and then hammer where you cut him.I think both Klitschkos are very good fighters, but what a bunch of horse ****. Where to begin?:
#1. Lets not pretend you wouldn't have given ALL THE CREDIT IN THE WORLD to Vitali had he beat an OLD LENNOX LEWIS
#2. If beating old fighters is so easy, how can you possibly excuse Vitali losing to an old Lewis?
#3. Lewis did beat Vitali. This cannot be contested. Its a fact, and cutting a man's face up
via punches is a universally accepted way to win bouts (be it in the eyes of fans, ring doctors, referees, sanctioning organizations, and athletic commissions)
#4. Landing enough leather to severely **** up Vitali's face is not "lucky".
#5. Its not cheating to beat up older fighters.
#6. Lewis was himself an older fighter when he was beating up many of those older fighters.
#7. The drunken gamblers in the audience are not the arbiters of victory and defeat. If this were the case, one would have to conclude Ricky Hatton beat Floyd Mayweather. Listen to the crowd!
on a sidenote- diego fuego put me on ignore following me owning him twice.
how sad
Comment
Comment