Originally posted by Trevbutler
View Post
And since then, he has beat a way overhyped fighter(Lacy), another fairly unknown fighter in the US(Kessler), and an old Hopkins. I only watched highlights of the Lacy fight but did see Kessler and Hopkins live. I thought Kessler gave a game effort but did just enough to loose. And Hopkins style and wear ended up getting the best of him.
Hops best weapons against Joe were countering, super defense, and ring intelligence, 3 things he had best tweaked post 40 hence other big wins post that age. Age excuse once again doesn't cut it.
Kessler is a massive deal in boxing, most regard him 2nd only to Joe in the SMW division, he's like to face the likes of the so called names in Miranda and Pavlik in time, and many favour Kessler, pretty even, what does that say? Even Americans seem to be accepting this of Kessler in decent numbers now, as most elsewhere do.
So you have a guy thats 45-0 that has only fought one really big name as far as americans are concerned. I did recognize 7 of the 45 fighters he has fought names.
You guys in the UK talk about he should be the best SMW of all time when we over here dont know if most of his 45-0 record was built off of Gary Locketts.
I think I give up, don't think we will come to any kind of agreement here. All respect to you though, you've been mature in your arguments and I hope I have as well. I try to stay away from name calling and childish things but still try to express my thoughts strongly.

Comment