To be the "BEST" you have to BEAT the BEAST!

[bsrizpac]

By arguing with him I have the vague hope that he might actually think. I've seen him do it before.

Good luck on that one. Resumes = subjective.

You are therefore basically correct.

[abadger]

Good luck on that one. Resumes = subjective.

You are therefore basically correct.

Of course I am.

[MindBat]

Huh!?

"To be the "BEST" you have to BEAT the BEAST!"

Big Foot was caught beating his Beast in the woods.

A sample of the sticky ejaculate substance was transported to the Dupont labs to determine if a new brand of duct tape can be created.

More news at six.

[C'MONMANG']

And who decides how they are ranked? Ring, the WBC, WBO? How come all their rankings are different? Who should we believe? And how come we should respect the ranking systems but not the championships handed out by the very same organisations?

Championships at least have the benefit of being indisputably won or lost in the ring, unlike ranking systems, which are based on what exactly? That's right, somebody, somewhere's opinion.

um RING..


next.. what did ja start watching boxing homay! lol

[C'MONMANG']

"To be the "BEST" you have to BEAT the BEAST!"

Big Foot was caught beating his Beast in the woods.

A sample of the sticky ejaculate substance was transported to the Dupont labs to determine if a new brand of duct tape can be created.

More news at six.

lmao...................

[abadger]

um RING..


next.. what did ja start watching boxing homay! lol

So, we allow ourselves to be told who the best boxers are by a magazine owned by Golden Boy Promotions...

While choosing to ignore (for some reason) the linear championships handed out by that same magazine...

You c'mon'mang, are every boxing promoters ideal 'boxing fan'.

How does it feel?

[bsrizpac]

um RING..


next.. what did ja start watching boxing homay! lol

So the Ring magazine is completely objective and without bias?

well you are also the same guy that thinks that compubox is NEVER wrong (as long as it favors whatever mexican warrior you love) so I guess this ridiculously naive idea makes sense coming from you.

[C'MONMANG']

So the Ring magazine is completely objective and without bias?

well you are also the same guy that thinks that compubox is NEVER wrong (as long as it favors whatever mexican warrior you love) so I guess this ridiculously naive idea makes sense coming from you.

no RING rankings make the most sense.

damn newbie lol

[abadger]

C'mon'mang, I refuse to believe that you are real.

[Fox McCloud]

UM, THE best is the guy beating all the other top guys, go away homay

So really, beating Clottey and Cintron is more credible than beating a Judah who had only previously lost to Tszyu?

You are saying Margarito had beaten all the best and Baldomir hadn't, right?