To be the "BEST" you have to BEAT the BEAST!

[C'MONMANG']

Is beating the lineal champion, beating the "best". HECK TO THE NO!!

[Slotff]

The title says you have to beat the beast, but no one can beat Tye Fields.

[x-PeROxiDE-x]

Is beating the lineal champion, beating the "best". HECK TO THE NO!!

Suprisingly, yes.

Not suprisingly, you're wrong again.

[ИATAS]

The title says you have to beat the beast, but no one can beat Tye Fields.

lmao, exactly what I was going to say

[C'MONMANG']

the Title Says You Have To Beat The Beast, But No One Can Beat Tye Fields.

Lmao........

[KnockoutTheFat]

The title says you have to beat the beast, but no one can beat Tye Fields.

That caught me off-guard

[abadger]

The problem with disregarding the linear championship in favour of a "beat the best" policy, is the question of who decides who the best is. Boxing fans? Boxing writers? Some sort of hypothetical consensus? Its all very subjective. You only have to read these forums or read or watch boxing media to see that neither fans nor writers nor anyone actually has a consensus.

Linear titles exist solely to solve this problem, so I would have to say that yes, they are important, and no, we cannot disregard them.

[C'MONMANG']

The problem with disregarding the linear championship in favour of a "beat the best" policy, is the question of who decides who the best is. Boxing fans? Boxing writers? Some sort of hypothetical consensus? Its all very subjective. You only have to read these forums or read or watch boxing media to see that neither fans nor writers nor anyone actually has a consensus.
Linear titles exist solely to solve this problem, so I would have to say that yes, they are important, and no, we cannot disregard them.

UM, THE best is the guy beating all the other top guys, go away homay

[P4PKING_2008]

Who is the beast? Or can you not understand spelling?

[C'MONMANG']

Who is the beast? Or can you not understand spelling?

Margarito is the beast. and Im from S.E. homay!