Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

It is amazing how you see a fighter age in one night.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    That 120-108 card will be wiped on my ass after a night of habaneros.
    Hatton won, 9-3. But what the hell was up with the 10th round?

    Comment


    • #62
      Hatton ain't shot at all. He also doesn't deserve to get trashed just because Mayweather beat him.

      Hatton owns the 140 division as of right now so no.

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by natas206 View Post
        man, people are using the term "shot" way to much. He's not shot. He didn't look that great or sharp, but that doesn't mean he's shot.
        thats basically it. he went on a huge blowout after the mayweather fight and probably took this fight lightly. Hatton can get back in shape no probs.

        Comment


        • #64
          In answer to the question in this thread, what makes you think Hatton has aged???

          He was non stop for 12 rounds, he had Lascano hurt on several occasions and probably won by 10 clear rounds?

          He was hurt a couple of times but came back stronger and turned the tide, that is not the actions of an aged fighter.

          Comment


          • #65
            Shot!? Thats a bit harsh! Dude just went 12 rounds at an intese pace and won every round basically!

            Comment


            • #66
              Maybe I'm crazy but I noticed within the first 10 seconds that he didn't seem to have the same bounce in his step as he did against Mayweather and I had a bad feeling about his performance for the rest of the fight. It wasn't a poor performance for by any means, but the problem is that he didn't seem 100% and I think that's why people are throwing out the "shot" term despite the victory.

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by mt102879 View Post
                Maybe I'm crazy but I noticed within the first 10 seconds that he didn't seem to have the same bounce in his step as he did against Mayweather and I had a bad feeling about his performance for the rest of the fight. It wasn't a poor performance for by any means, but the problem is that he didn't seem 100% and I think that's why people are throwing out the "shot" term despite the victory.
                he did have a chest infection and that might have affected him who knows. i think he looked sharp and was a good fight to watch. he has not aged at all but i agree the mayweather loss has probably dented his confidence as a first loss does to any fighter. i think he bounced back in style last night and deserves credit by proving to people that HE ISNT SHOT.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Hatton IMO definitely does not look the same. He looked sluggish, brawled ******ly, got hit way too much and got seriously hurt twice. The referee was severely pro-Hatton. He did not look good last night especially considering the opponent in front of him. If he fights Mayweather again he'll get KO'd sooner. In my mind he's damaged goods.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by joshyp18 View Post
                    he did have a chest infection and that might have affected him who knows. i think he looked sharp and was a good fight to watch. he has not aged at all but i agree the mayweather loss has probably dented his confidence as a first loss does to any fighter. i think he bounced back in style last night and deserves credit by proving to people that HE ISNT SHOT.
                    This could be the case I forgot about that. Maybe the chest infection did contribute to last night's poor performance...

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by WetSexyLlamaPR View Post
                      This could be the case I forgot about that. Maybe the chest infection did contribute to last night's poor performance...
                      Chest infection may have something to do with it ...

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP