Maybe I'm crazy but I noticed within the first 10 seconds that he didn't seem to have the same bounce in his step as he did against Mayweather and I had a bad feeling about his performance for the rest of the fight. It wasn't a poor performance for by any means, but the problem is that he didn't seem 100% and I think that's why people are throwing out the "shot" term despite the victory.
Maybe I'm crazy but I noticed within the first 10 seconds that he didn't seem to have the same bounce in his step as he did against Mayweather and I had a bad feeling about his performance for the rest of the fight. It wasn't a poor performance for by any means, but the problem is that he didn't seem 100% and I think that's why people are throwing out the "shot" term despite the victory.
he did have a chest infection and that might have affected him who knows. i think he looked sharp and was a good fight to watch. he has not aged at all but i agree the mayweather loss has probably dented his confidence as a first loss does to any fighter. i think he bounced back in style last night and deserves credit by proving to people that HE ISNT SHOT.
Hatton IMO definitely does not look the same. He looked sluggish, brawled ******ly, got hit way too much and got seriously hurt twice. The referee was severely pro-Hatton. He did not look good last night especially considering the opponent in front of him. If he fights Mayweather again he'll get KO'd sooner. In my mind he's damaged goods.
he did have a chest infection and that might have affected him who knows. i think he looked sharp and was a good fight to watch. he has not aged at all but i agree the mayweather loss has probably dented his confidence as a first loss does to any fighter. i think he bounced back in style last night and deserves credit by proving to people that HE ISNT SHOT.
This could be the case I forgot about that. Maybe the chest infection did contribute to last night's poor performance...
Comment