Roy Jones Jr vs. Joe Calzaghe: One and Done For Joe

[C'MONMANG']

WRONG. VERY WRONG. But how about you back that up with facts? Can you do that?



And you base this on what? Roy would have fighters ready to go in the first 3 rounds at LHW and would take them 12. Again, you have no basis.



Got it. I see. Then maybe we should take him at his word when he speaks of beating Calzaghe. Right? Or when he said the same thing about Ruiz (how he would stop him in six). You're hilarious.

rOY DOESNt counter off the ropes like he used to period. he still does it, but not as much or affective.

[THE REED]

Someone that quickly takes a post making some fair points replying with they're caps name, several subjective one liners, lol's and next please comments; is a wise kid who doesn't deserve an ice cream off mummy, let alone one's effort to engage an intelligent conversation. You probably play tennis against a wall thinking sooner or later, if you keep up the pressure, awkwardness, and annoyance, you'll win. Try hitting it with your head.

lmao oh ****... i like imdazed... but that was hilarious...


prime for prime roy vs joe would be close.. yet unanimous and decisive for roy.

roy not KOing tito means absolutely NOTHING, being that hes fought a lesser opponents in his prime and carried the distance... if anyone is known for having the capability of KOing his opponents, but not doing so on purpose.. its roy...

joe c deserves more credit than some of the posters on here.. and not as much credit from others...

joe vs roy now... will not be a blowout either way IMO... roys not as shot as people seem to speculate... and still has somethin nice... should be a close but unanimous decision in either direction..

non biasly speaking... joe should win 116-112... but i hope roy pulls it off

[IMDAZED]

rOY DOESNt counter off the ropes like he used to period. he still does it, but not as much or affective.

This is your factual statement? LOLOL. Point out some fights that prove this? Please...or are you afraid of being embarrassed? Please point out how he doesn't counter like he used to. You're very wrong...

[rod25]

dumb logic? Old Roy would have FINSIHED tito...

if he LAYS on the Ropes Calzaghe will get in that ass.

When RJJ lays on the ropes and slips Joes slaps and takes his best body shots,RJJ will then throw his UPPERCUTS, 1 will land and the show is on!

[IMDAZED]

lmao oh ****... i like imdazed... but that was hilarious...


prime for prime roy vs joe would be close.. yet unanimous and decisive for roy.

roy not KOing tito means absolutely NOTHING, being that hes fought a lesser opponents in his prime and carried the distance... if anyone is known for having the capability of KOing his opponents, but not doing so on purpose.. its roy...

joe c deserves more credit than some of the posters on here.. and not as much credit from others...

joe vs roy now... will not be a blowout either way IMO... roys not as shot as people seem to speculate... and still has somethin nice... should be a close but unanimous decision in either direction..

non biasly speaking... joe should win 116-112... but i hope roy pulls it off

Prime for prime, Jones blows Calzaghe out. Just my opinion. I have my reasons but I won't resort to "you're a Jones hater and you think Calzaghe is untouchable" to prove it. And I don't base it on some imaginary system I have where I know how much faster one guy is to the other.

Jones was stronger, faster, more skilled, more intelligent and had fought FAR better opposition. The onus is on others to show why WOULDN'T he win convincingly

[C'MONMANG']

This is your factual statement? LOLOL. Point out some fights that prove this? Please...or are you afraid of being embarrassed? Please point out how he doesn't counter like he used to. You're very wrong...

Tarver, Johnson, Tito

and I said OFF THE ROPES!!!! PAY ATTENTION

[Chunk..]

''Ladies and gentlemen, he turned back the clock tonight........''

[THE REED]

Prime for prime, Jones blows Calzaghe out. Just my opinion. I have my reasons but I won't resort to "you're a Jones hater and you think Calzaghe is untouchable" to prove it. And I don't base it on some imaginary system I have where I know how much faster one guy is to the other.

Jones was stronger, faster, more skilled, more intelligent and had fought FAR better opposition. The onus is on others to show why WOULDN'T he win convincingly

thats because that line wouldnt work on me lol

[IMDAZED]

Tarver, Johnson, Tito

and I said OFF THE ROPES!!!! PAY ATTENTION

Which Tarver fight? And what did he do wrong off the ropes with Tito?

Thanks.

Hehe.

[IMDAZED]

thats because that line wouldnt work on me lol

Oh, it doesn't work on me either. Which is why he had no other option but to escape the conversation. As soon as I saw the "you think Jones is untouchable and Calzaghe way down" comment I knew he was full of ****.