Originally posted by KnockoutTheFat
View Post
Lennox is easy to criticize because he's well, Lennox, but Mickey Walker is rarely criticized for not rematching Tiger Flowers (a real controversy). Muhammad Ali is rarely criticized for not rematching Jimmy Young and Ken Norton again (real controversies). Larry Holmes not that much for not rematching Tim Witherspoon (real controversy). Eusebio Pedroza never rematched Juan Laporte or Bernard Taylor (real controversies).
Yet you hardly hear people talking about this, and these guys kept fighting on, meaning they still had the desire to fight, but didn't want to rematch the guys who gave them real controversial fights (not a tough fight which is fairly won on a gruesome cut). Lewis was already losing his motivation, as evidenced by his lack of proper preparation for both this and the first Rahman fight.
Lummox may be a lousy commentator who sounds like a flaming ****sexual, but coward, no.
People (especially ****ali fanboys) can argue all they want about "Brittley would have, could have, should have" done this if not for the cut. Fine, they can have that.
The rest of the world can see what DID happen. Quitali had a Lewis in front of him who was inactive for over a year, overweight, and nearly 38 years old. He lost.
Of course, Lewis was such a great fighter even when he was underprepared. Surely, he couldn't lose to Oleg Maskaev's ***** when he was underprepared, right?

Naturally, Lewis when 2 years older, less active, and even heavier, still WON against ****ali.
****ali fanboys are like that security guard in The Wire. They want it to be one way (their speculation of what would have, could have, should have happened), but it's the other way (reality, Lewis TKO 6 Vitali).
Comment