Originally posted by NAPO
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Most Limited, One Dimensional Boxers
Collapse
-
Originally posted by NAPO View Posti hate to say it because i like him but KELLY PAVLIK.
How the **** is a fighter who throws a million 1-2's not one-dimensional? I haven't seen more than that. Even against Miranda, it was just the same thing. Coming forward, 1-2, 1-2, 1-2.
Comment
-
Originally posted by P4PKING_2008 View PostCotto, Hatton, Calzaghe, Pavlik, Mayorga.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DWiens421 View PostPeople told me I was a ****ing idiot because I said Pavlik is one-dimensional.
How the **** is a fighter who throws a million 1-2's not one-dimensional? I haven't seen more than that. Even against Miranda, it was just the same thing. Coming forward, 1-2, 1-2, 1-2.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DWiens421 View PostWhat is your definition of limited and one-dimensional?
Some people are construing it as a no skill piece of **** who just brawls it up.
I think of one-dimensional as a fighter who can't make effective adjustments past their plan A.
Kelly Pavlik is in trouble if someone figures out how to neutralize the 1-2.
Jeff Lacy is in trouble if he can't blow someone out of there in a couple of rounds or get someone to be truly intimidated.
Antonio Margarito is in trouble if someone has the footspeed to hit and get out of there.
I think I like some other people's interpretation of one dimensional better than mine.. You cited some excellent examples of various sort, DW421.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Addison View PostAs far as limited Boxers it's a wide open field. There are many, many to choose from. I think it's important that they all be highlighted and exposed.
I think I like some other people's interpretation of one dimensional better than mine.. You cited some excellent examples of various sort, DW421.
Sugar Shane Mosley
That is the reason he was blown out twice in the first fight against my two favorite boxers. The only thing he did differently in the rematches was hide from their best weapon (Forrest's straight right and Wright's jab), but didn't manage to do anything significantly different. He didn't have an answer for Oscar's jab in their rematch for the most part.
He just seems to be kind of stuck in his style of fighting, and seems genuinely confused when he is being outdone.
Comment
-
If that is the case, people could call Thomas Hearns one dimensional. If he is, well it carried him far.
Being "one dimensional" is just fine if you have other intangibles to back you up, such as Speed, Power, Toughness, Strength, Stamina, Heart. Even Height and Reach.
If you use the tools you have well, and package them correctly, it can be a huge wall for an opponent to climb.Last edited by deanrw; 04-19-2008, 07:31 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DWiens421 View PostYou know someone who seems to have an impossible time making adjustments that might be added to this list?
Sugar Shane Mosley
That is the reason he was blown out twice in the first fight against my two favorite boxers. The only thing he did differently in the rematches was hide from their best weapon (Forrest's straight right and Wright's jab), but didn't manage to do anything significantly different. He didn't have an answer for Oscar's jab in their rematch for the most part.
He just seems to be kind of stuck in his style of fighting, and seems genuinely confused when he is being outdone.
Comment
Comment