Miguel Cotto, Ricky Hatton, Juan Diaz, Wladimir Klitschko, Valuev, Paquiao... The list is immense. But they manage cuz of huge size advantages and/or fighting senior citizens.
Miguel Cotto, Ricky Hatton, Juan Diaz, Wladimir Klitschko, Valuev, Paquiao... The list is immense. But they manage cuz of huge size advantages and/or fighting senior citizens.
What is your definition of limited and one-dimensional?
Some people are construing it as a no skill piece of **** who just brawls it up.
I think of one-dimensional as a fighter who can't make effective adjustments past their plan A.
Kelly Pavlik is in trouble if someone figures out how to neutralize the 1-2.
Jeff Lacy is in trouble if he can't blow someone out of there in a couple of rounds or get someone to be truly intimidated.
Antonio Margarito is in trouble if someone has the footspeed to hit and get out of there.
What is your definition of limited and one-dimensional?
Some people are construing it as a no skill piece of **** who just brawls it up.
I think of one-dimensional as a fighter who can't make effective adjustments past their plan A.
Kelly Pavlik is in trouble if someone figures out how to neutralize the 1-2.
Jeff Lacy is in trouble if he can't blow someone out of there in a couple of rounds or get someone to be truly intimidated.
Antonio Margarito is in trouble if someone has the footspeed to hit and get out of there.
It's open for interpretation. I leave that to the brotherhood.
For me though one dimensional means having one dimension in a tactical sense. Having one dimension in terms of a fighters arsenal. That means only having a right hand as an answer for everything like Lacy, Kessler, and Mr. O'Neill Bell. Having a tremendous weapon like that is great - but what happens when it gets neutralized?
Comment