You Cotto Guys Are F$%@# Hypocrites

[tyson]

You really don't want it with 2501...

You and your girl makes a great couple. Always thought that.

[tito yuca]

There are no double standards is that we know Cotto is better than Margo or Floyd. You forget Cotto can put on pressure as good or better than Margarito and can box circles around him. And in Mayweather's case Cotto can box as good as Mayweather and can pressure him until he crumbles.

Cotto is the more versatile fighter he can box or pressure, Margarito can't box and Mayweather can't pressure is as simple as that.

Tenia que ser un puertoriqueño moron.

LOOOOOL I'm a moron for saying that a guy who got hit 248 times by a 36 year-old Shane Mosley does not box as good Floyd Mayweather?

Even against Judah (a fight that dumb PRicans use to support their ****** theory that Cotto would beat Floyd) Cotto got hit 132 times compared to 89 vs. Floyd.

Newsflash, kid, if Cotto boxed better than Floyd he'd be P4P #1.

[2501]

You really don't want it with 2501...

i lean like a cholo.

[Ray Ray]

Why because I don't think like you?, What has Floyd done to make him the best, fight an old DLH to a dull split decision or knockout an overweight midget that did half the work for him. I'm not saying he's a bum the man does have skills, I just don't think he's the best.

What he's the best at is managing his career, he has made people think he's the best by carefully choosing his opponents. People he knows don't stand a chance against him, he has cherrypicked his way to the top. But the problem now is he has run out of victims, he's trying to use the same victims again. But people are starting to see the real Floyd.

You clearly just started watching boxing man....I admit his resume at 147 could do a lot better but to say he hasnt done **** is bull****. His resume at 130 & 135 is what set him up to be one of the best boxer OF OUR TIME (not an all time great though) So it least tell the whole truth instead of making **** fit your narrow ass prospective.

[2501]

Newsflash, kid, if Cotto boxed better than Floyd he'd be P4P #1.

i agree that Cotto isnt as good in that area as Floyd, but we ALL know being the best fighter alone just dont put you @ the the #1 spot.

[oldgringo]

You got thrashed, man.
Need to answer back in proper fashion, playa.

You're right he lost big time.

[NAPO]

cry me a ****ing ocean ****head u were the sema guy that said cotto had no chance with judah and mosley and u won't give up..take cotto of ur list then crybaby.

[NAPO]

Tenia que ser un puertoriqueño moron.

papi ignoralo el tipo es un hipocrita se lo mama a cotto pero cuando hay liga se lo mama al otro oponente el tipo no vale la pena discutir y ademas es dominiki.

[BMWM3P]

LOOOOOL I'm a moron for saying that a guy who got hit 248 times by a 36 year-old Shane Mosley does not box as good Floyd Mayweather?

Even against Judah (a fight that dumb PRicans use to support their ****** theory that Cotto would beat Floyd) Cotto got hit 132 times compared to 89 vs. Floyd.

Newsflash, kid, if Cotto boxed better than Floyd he'd be P4P #1.

Newsflash, you ****** Cotto also KOD Judah and Floyd doesn't throw half the punches Mosley did. ANd did you now that there's no official pound for pound ranking, it's just a bunch of **** that changes from boxing writer to boxing writer. I knew I was right about you.

[tyson]

i agree that Cotto isnt as good in that area as Floyd, but we ALL know being the best fighter alone just dont put you @ the the #1 spot.

Wasn't that the original point of the P4P system?
Where nr.1 would be the favorite to beat any other man in boxing if they were the same weight?

P4P nowadays resembles more like a ranking of accomplishments.
But that's not what it was made for, am I wrong?