*sigh* seriously rog, this is about the 5th time you quoted something in regards to me and made yourself look like you just got out of 6th grade.
this is the post you quoted from me and responded with this even though i wasnt even talking to you. now seeing that you somehow lack basic fundamental reading comprehension, ima break it down for you though im not quite sure how much i will be able to see since its pretty cut and dry.
So in this quote, you're saying raycorey wasnt saying cotto couldn't do that to Margarito right, that he was talking about Cotto/Mayweather.
here, raycorey is describing an incident where he was debating with a friend on Cotto/Margarito.
That part of his post indicated that raycorey favors Margarito for the win.
This part of his post indicates that HIS friend feels Cotto would outbox the slower Margarito. Followin me so far Corky?
Here, raycorey indicates that he said Margo would be able to draw Cotto into a war because Cotto isnt as smart enough o just box/Potshot like Mayweather would do. So I respond to his post about what he feels Cotto wouldnt be able to do with MARGARITO which he told his friend.
Now, ANYONE who with ANY reading comprehension understands that the subject of his post is about what Cotto WOULDNT be able to do against Margarito. But for some reason, this somehow escapes you and you post this BRILLIANT display of plain and basic common sense with the excitement of a 7 year old child going to Disney Land for the first time.
So rogelio, explain to me how raycorey WASNT talking about what Cotto wouldnt be able to achieve with Margarito, but rather what he wouldnt be able to achieve against Mayweather with your infinite scholastic knowledge. I'll be waiting.
i mean its TOO easy with you kid. its amazing. how bout this, why dont we do a poll to see who is more respected here? if you are REALLY that confident in the **** you talk, it wouldnt be a problem. lose has to give up their screenname. how about Rogy boy?
Originally posted by 2501
So in this quote, you're saying raycorey wasnt saying cotto couldn't do that to Margarito right, that he was talking about Cotto/Mayweather.
here, raycorey is describing an incident where he was debating with a friend on Cotto/Margarito.
That part of his post indicated that raycorey favors Margarito for the win.
This part of his post indicates that HIS friend feels Cotto would outbox the slower Margarito. Followin me so far Corky?
Here, raycorey indicates that he said Margo would be able to draw Cotto into a war because Cotto isnt as smart enough o just box/Potshot like Mayweather would do. So I respond to his post about what he feels Cotto wouldnt be able to do with MARGARITO which he told his friend.
Originally posted by 2501
Now, ANYONE who with ANY reading comprehension understands that the subject of his post is about what Cotto WOULDNT be able to do against Margarito. But for some reason, this somehow escapes you and you post this BRILLIANT display of plain and basic common sense with the excitement of a 7 year old child going to Disney Land for the first time.
So rogelio, explain to me how raycorey WASNT talking about what Cotto wouldnt be able to achieve with Margarito, but rather what he wouldnt be able to achieve against Mayweather with your infinite scholastic knowledge. I'll be waiting.
i mean its TOO easy with you kid. its amazing. how bout this, why dont we do a poll to see who is more respected here? if you are REALLY that confident in the **** you talk, it wouldnt be a problem. lose has to give up their screenname. how about Rogy boy?
because cotto is to mayweather what you guys say margarito is to cotto so go **** off biaaaaaaaaatch!!!!!!!!
Comment