Calzaghe Blasts Hopkins, Eyes Kelly Pavlik
Collapse
-
Yeah right, That's a bunch of bull**** propaganda. Who the **** was Joe Calzaghe 6 years ago? He wasn't even the best in his bum division at that point. Haven't you realized everything about Joe Calzaghe, Frank Warren and the whole camp is NOTHING BUT BULL****. Kind of like this picture they released. http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t...ZTW4xFOuHpY19QComment
-
Comment
-
1. i did pick lacy to beat joe but it wasnt cause i thought lacy was a greatly skilled fighter. I saw from the rubin williams fight how beatable he was. No defense and he only throws looping overhand rights. I picked him cause i didnt believe in joe. He had been fighting for 10 years and never fought anyone of note and he constantly backed out of fights. Add that to the fact he was gettin up in age I thought an aggresive youg fighter could just roll over him. But i was wrong and my view has changed. He went from a fraud to a decent fighter with the win, not a great one.
2.He then beat kessler which again was decent but not great. Did anyone notice that Joe was a so called champion before either lacy or kessler even turned pro. Truth is he should of won. There really shouldnt been any doubt in it considering he was this long reigning champion but there was. Thats wear the problem lies. It took joe over 10 years to fight anyone of worth and even then they werent that worthy. Thats says something even if his fans wont admit it.
3. People like to say hop ducked him years ago but truth is 7 years ago joe was a nobody and he was already holdin a belt for 4 years. Tell me why anyone (roy,hop.or toney) would go over there to fight him. It made no sense ,no reward. Win and its so what whos he , lose and then what, and thats probably what hop realized when he backed out.
4.What happened to glen johnso3n. Didnt he back out of 3 fights with him . What happened to clinton woods. no he want no part of them. He would rather build his legacy on the back of a 43 year old man who everyone knows looked less than spectacular the last time out. Well im not fooled. Fighting 2 guys dont change the 10 years of duckin before that. Truth is the fact that a 43 years man is the best fighter he ever fought and half the world still thinks he can lose. thats sad and he only has himself to blame.
Oh yah i dont know who but some guy posted in this thread earlier said hops wins over trinindad and dlh were overated but then said lacy,kesler, and eubank were great. That guys a fool. Cause no matter what u think of hops resume its still way beter than joes. So what does that say abou his. Good fight though. Ill take hop by ud.Comment
-
Im new here so I dont wanna step on any toes but I wanted to share my opinion on a few things.
1. i did pick lacy to beat joe but it wasnt cause i thought lacy was a greatly skilled fighter. I saw from the rubin williams fight how beatable he was. No defense and he only throws looping overhand rights. I picked him cause i didnt believe in joe. He had been fighting for 10 years and never fought anyone of note and he constantly backed out of fights. Add that to the fact he was gettin up in age I thought an aggresive youg fighter could just roll over him. But i was wrong and my view has changed. He went from a fraud to a decent fighter with the win, not a great one.
2.He then beat kessler which again was decent but not great. Did anyone notice that Joe was a so called champion before either lacy or kessler even turned pro. Truth is he should of won. There really shouldnt been any doubt in it considering he was this long reigning champion but there was. Thats wear the problem lies. It took joe over 10 years to fight anyone of worth and even then they werent that worthy. Thats says something even if his fans wont admit it.
3. People like to say hop ducked him years ago but truth is 7 years ago joe was a nobody and he was already holdin a belt for 4 years. Tell me why anyone (roy,hop.or toney) would go over there to fight him. It made no sense ,no reward. Win and its so what whos he , lose and then what, and thats probably what hop realized when he backed out.
4.What happened to glen johnso3n. Didnt he back out of 3 fights with him . What happened to clinton woods. no he want no part of them. He would rather build his legacy on the back of a 43 year old man who everyone knows looked less than spectacular the last time out. Well im not fooled. Fighting 2 guys dont change the 10 years of duckin before that. Truth is the fact that a 43 years man is the best fighter he ever fought and half the world still thinks he can lose. thats sad and he only has himself to blame.
Oh yah i dont know who but some guy posted in this thread earlier said hops wins over trinindad and dlh were overated but then said lacy,kesler, and eubank were great. That guys a fool. Cause no matter what u think of hops resume its still way beter than joes. So what does that say abou his. Good fight though. Ill take hop by ud.Comment
-
right on calzaghe, keep thinkin about Pavlik. Hopkins is old, washed up, he's nothing, pavlik is a huge fight, big payday, you're going to be a star in the states! no need to train hard, don't worry about popkins, eat and drink lots...Comment
-
Comment
Comment