The most promising truly untested fighter

[Orion]

Yes...if anything Marquez "ducked" him. I'm not really into all that bull, but Soto was far more deserving then Juarez or Solis.

Absolutely, Juarez doesnt deserve anything ever again imo he has had too many chances, and Solis???

[Fox McCloud]

Junior Witter might be the best name thrown out so far.

[warp1432]

Absolutely, Juarez doesnt deserve anything ever again imo he has had too many chances, and Solis???

Jorge Solis was scheduled to fight Marquez on September 15th, but pulled out because of an injury.

[-Hyperion-]

Jorge Solis was scheduled to fight Marquez on September 15th, but pulled out because of an injury.

it was jorge barrios.....pulled out because of detached retinas.....

jorge solis would be agood test for luevano-linares-guerrero...

[Chunk..]

Junior Witter might be the best name thrown out so far.

I think it is and it ain't his fault his not getting them big fights, Hatton's ducking him and Malinaggi and Torres are staying way clear of him. He's screwed really!

[warp1432]

Though this topic is iffy. I mean you always don't need a "SUPERSTAR" to prove you are great.

I mean people like Valero belong in this topic, but Guzman and Witter have been tested. Guzman especially. Chad Dawson also fought an undefeated adamek, so I think he's been "tested"

Untested would be the 2005 Margarito. All he really had on his name was Kermit Cintron. He really didn't have a case until he beat Clottey. Even now it still is a pretty bad resume, but before Clottey it was horrible.

[RichCCFC]

David Haye... He is proven at Cruiser but we are yet to see if he can do it at Heavy.

[Chunk..]

David Haye... He is proven at Cruiser but we are yet to see if he can do it at Heavy.

[johnm is...]

Calzaghe, Hands down...

For **** sake.. Did you lose a bet? Or did you actually CHOOSE that ugly skank for your avatar?

[STEELHEAD]

vanes martirosyan 19-0.