Who has the most impressive resume, Mayweather or DLH?

[BrendanWoodside]

There is no comparison imo. dlh by a mile

[JoartCC]

Who do you believe has the most impressive resume out of Mayweather and De La Hoya?

Anyone who says Fake FLoyd has an impressive resume are out of their brains.

This fake has ducked and weave through almost every elite of his era.

Heck.

The ducks he made are even more than the elites that he has faced.

He should just stay in the WWE where fakes stay.

[wmute]

Oscar fought the best opposition by a mile. To bad he lost or barely won (Quartey, Whitaker) without giving rematches 90% of the fights that mattered.

[JoartCC]

Oscar fought the best opposition by a mile. To bad he lost or barely won (Quartey, Whitaker) without giving rematches 90% of the fights that mattered.

Let's use your logic and apply that to fake Floyd.

Too bad Fake Floyd ducked 90% of the fights that mattered.

Very good logic wmute may I say.

Very very good.

[Newyorkknicks07]

DLH has fought far better opponents. I dont understand why May wont fight Margarito or Cotto.

[DIEGO DA HITMAN]

You're all saying DLH has fought the better fighters but are you all forgetting that he lost to most of them?? So what if he's fought some of the best fighters of the past 10-15 years. It's about who you beat. Not who you fight

Exactly- Floyd's resume has a big W beside the name, "Oscar De la Hoya", and a big 0 in the loss departmrnet, so even though Oscar has maybe fought a couple bigger names, Mayweather has the more impressive resume.

[JoartCC]

DLH has fought far better opponents. I dont understand why May wont fight Margarito or Cotto.

Don't wonder any longer.

Here's the vid of Fake Floyd pissing in his pants.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbyQsaigxxU&feature=related

And to think Marg confronted him alone while Fake FLoyd is surrounded by his numerous bodyguards and lackeys.

[JoartCC]

Exactly- Floyd's resume has a big W beside the name, "Oscar De la Hoya", and a big 0 in the loss departmrnet, so even though Oscar has maybe fought a couple bigger names, Mayweather has the more impressive resume.

A resume full of Baldo's, Corley's, Judah's, Gatti's, and shot DLH.

Dude wakeup already.

You're not in dreamland anymore.

[DIEGO DA HITMAN]

A resume full of Baldo's, Corley's, Judah's, Gatti's, and shot DLH.

Dude wakeup already.

You're not in dreamland anymore.

Losses don't look good on a resume. If you went for a job interview, would you list your failures, even if it was a challenge that you failed? The question was better resume, not who's fought the better competition.

[DIEGO DA HITMAN]

A resume full of Baldo's, Corley's, Judah's, Gatti's, and shot DLH.

Dude wakeup already.

You're not in dreamland anymore.

Let's see- both resumes have one thing in common: Mayweather beat Oscar. How is there any question? If two guys applied for a job, and had competed head to head, which guy are you gonna hire, the winner or loser of the competition? This isn't that hard.