Why is pavlik vs taylor2 okay and mayweather vs oscar2 not??

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • moy22487
    The silent poster
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Oct 2005
    • 3257
    • 99
    • 51
    • 9,856

    #61
    GOOD POST THANX.. Idiot post

    I kind of knew i was one of the few that are for both fights.
    And im happy for the most part that people gave good conversations and left good respectable post (even if they were againt my thaughts), thats why i like this place, to every one that posted there thaughts and replyed without insult or knowing what they were talking about thanx,

    for the people who posted randome **** i say, make your point and explain it so you can gain some respect.

    Comment

    • moy22487
      The silent poster
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Oct 2005
      • 3257
      • 99
      • 51
      • 9,856

      #62
      Originally posted by reedickyaluss
      oscar was comin off a knockout win over mayorga a yr before... not sure whats considered active... but 12months is probably the max
      second fight floyd is going to go in with 9 mont lay off and oscar only 4. doesnt that make you a bit more intrested. Or the fact that floyd had a Knockout of a guy who had not been knocked out in his carrere?

      Comment

      • johnm is...
        ****in *** Broads
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Oct 2005
        • 10700
        • 820
        • 1,382
        • 48,813

        #63
        Originally posted by reedickyaluss
        oscar was comin off a knockout win over mayorga a yr before... not sure whats considered active... but 12months is probably the max

        I stand corrected. 1 fight since '04.. then Mayweather.

        Comment

        • brently1979
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jan 2007
          • 1226
          • 154
          • 441
          • 13,535

          #64
          Because Talyor vs Pavlik was an awesome fight and people want to see it again.

          Comment

          • Gareth Ivanovic
            Bale, Bale, Bale
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Mar 2007
            • 10113
            • 295
            • 597
            • 20,073

            #65
            Of course there's the mandatory rematch clause, but for me I would rather see Pavlik/Taylor II becuase even though Pavlik won by KO, I think Taylor has a decent shot of turning it around. Mayweather I think will win the rematch easier and there are better fights and more relevant fights out there for Mayweather.

            Comment

            • Allucard
              Undisputed Champion
              • Jun 2007
              • 5979
              • 393
              • 56
              • 12,399

              #66
              Originally posted by El Dominicano
              To answer the thread! Its ok because Taylor put up a really good fight and PBF basically blew right threw Oscar! To a point where PBF could have done much more but chose to win by an easy U.D.
              You were prolly crying Oscar won after the fight and now you're saying easy UD for pbf LOL

              Comment

              • rebmogul
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Dec 2007
                • 1354
                • 34
                • 0
                • 7,718

                #67
                Originally posted by moy22487
                if you break it down yes the pavlik fight was a better fight.
                Pavlik clearly won the fight, Oscar vs mayweather was one point away from draw.(your scoring doesn't matter only the judges do, and Evey body likes different things.)
                Taylor and Oscar were both champions so the both deserve a rematch.
                The Taylor rematch wont be happening at 160 and it seems like Oscar vs Floyd wont happen at 154. the divisions were the champ lost there belts.
                There are better fights out there for Floyd but there are just as many for pavlik.
                So my question is why is Taylor and pavlik rematch OK but people are *****-en about the Oscar mayweather fight?
                (besides entertainment, they are both good calls)

                If you don't like the tread don't waste your time and others by simply saying you think its a dumb thread.
                because this is a safe fight for both fighters and EVERYONE already knows the outcome. oscar to afraid to do anything after getting clipped by a few over hand rights, fm wins by decision and oscar explaining how it just wasn't a jab night. (yawn)

                Comment

                • boxingknight
                  Banned
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Jan 2008
                  • 482
                  • 26
                  • 0
                  • 572

                  #68
                  Everyone already knows Mayweathers going to beat Oscar again. It's just a waste of a match, that Mayweather is looking for easy cash.

                  Comment

                  • machotime
                    Caballo
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Nov 2005
                    • 3109
                    • 136
                    • 65
                    • 10,001

                    #69
                    Originally posted by moy22487
                    if you break it down yes the pavlik fight was a better fight.
                    Pavlik clearly won the fight, Oscar vs mayweather was one point away from draw.(your scoring doesn't matter only the judges do, and Evey body likes different things.)
                    Taylor and Oscar were both champions so the both deserve a rematch.
                    The Taylor rematch wont be happening at 160 and it seems like Oscar vs Floyd wont happen at 154. the divisions were the champ lost there belts.
                    There are better fights out there for Floyd but there are just as many for pavlik.
                    So my question is why is Taylor and pavlik rematch OK but people are *****-en about the Oscar mayweather fight?
                    (besides entertainment, they are both good calls)

                    If you don't like the tread don't waste your time and others by simply saying you think its a dumb thread.

                    #1- there was a rematch clause
                    #2- DLH has only really beat one opponent(Mayorga) in the the last 4.5 years and that opponent is mediocre.
                    #3- Taylor has only lost to Pavlik, they are both hungry young and competitive, and if Taylor takes a different approch to the fight he has a very good chance of beating Pavlik.
                    #4- DLH is a cross-dresser
                    Last edited by machotime; 01-29-2008, 07:23 PM.

                    Comment

                    • johnm is...
                      ****in *** Broads
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Oct 2005
                      • 10700
                      • 820
                      • 1,382
                      • 48,813

                      #70
                      Originally posted by machotime
                      #4- DLH is a cross-dresser
                      I think that pretty much says it all right there.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP