Defending Calzaghe v. Defending All of Calzaghe's **** opponents?
Hardest part of being Calzaghe fan?
Collapse
-
"the next mike tyson" Jeff Lacy, as many were shouting before calzaghe beat him. Mikkel Kessler, he was great and undefeated and could easily beat calz and lost hmmmmmmm
wank warren? take a look at all his fighters, he gives them lower oppenents for ages, joe is beating theese undefeated champs at the age of 35. we dont need to defend him, that defends him enuff IMOComment
-
You've said it. His resume can be defended as long as the 0 is there on the loss column.
Once that 0 is gone, his resume will look average and his resume will be rated as one of the weakest among all the other champions from the past who have made 20+ title defenses.Comment
-
There are only a few guys in that class, and Joe will still have the better resume than Hopkins,You've said it. His resume can be defended as long as the 0 is there on the loss column.
Once that 0 is gone, his resume will look average and his resume will be rated as one of the weakest among all the other champions from the past who have made 20+ title defenses.Comment
-
Comment
-
That is to be determined depending on what happens in his next fight against that same person. Losing to a 43 year old Hopkins would hurt his resume from average to below average.Comment
Comment