Whitaker landed more punches, controlled the fight, made DLH look bad and even dropped him. The flurries at the ends of the rounds by DLH don't count because they didn't hit.
who won Dela Hoya v Whitaker
Collapse
-
AMG Lampley ****in looves Dela Hoya he was virtually arguing with Roy Jones & MerchantThe bold is why people give De la Hoya credit for **** he doesn't deserve. De la Hoya always did that flurry **** and always missed most of those punches but you have the crowd going wild and commentators riding his **** when all he is doing is missing those punches. Its not like those De la Hoya flurries partially land he misses with most of that and gets credit for it from the judges which is complete bull****. Whitaker won this fight to me.
Also to Darkstar the PBF vs De la Hoya fight was not close for real. Fighters are not supposed to get credit for INEFFECTIVE AGGRESSION but that **** seems like the norm these days and that is why scores in fights be all ****ed up. Being aggressive don't mean **** if the aggressor is not accomplishing anything.
LOOK AT DELA HOYA SC**** HIM WITH A LEFT HOOK ,
IT MISSED HIM JIM CALM DOWN
Comment
-
**** like that is why I ****ing hate Lampley as a commentator. He is always calling the fight wrong. He does **** like say De la Hoya gets hit with a left hook Lampley will say the other fighter just got hit when that **** never happened and I be like what the **** fight is Jim Lampley watching. Lampley has ****ed up a lot of fights over the years.Comment
-
-
Jim Lampley probably relates to Oscar himself in that Dela Hoya is a quiet white boy who doesnt look or act like a fighter**** like that is why I ****ing hate Lampley as a commentator. He is always calling the fight wrong. He does **** like say De la Hoya gets hit with a left hook Lampley will say the other fighter just got hit when that **** never happened and I be like what the **** fight is Jim Lampley watching. Lampley has ****ed up a lot of fights over the years.Comment
-
Its scored on EFFECTIVE AGGRESSION not just aggression alone. See this what I was talking about. Fighters getting credit for just being aggressive when that **** is doing nothing at all. Read how fights are scored over again and you will see what I'm talking about.
Go on youtube and listen to when Harold Lederman reads the rules and scoring for a fight I will bet you all of my points he says that part of the fight will be scored on EFFECTIVE AGGRESSION not just being aggresive.Comment
-
'Aggression' is a good excuse to score a fight for a more exciting fighter. Pernell Whitaker won this fight IMO, no doubt in my mind about it.
Even if you don't agree with me, I'm sure you can agree that those judges were crooked. How could they score it 9 rounds to 3 for DLH? No f'in way.Comment
-
Lampley was that bad IMO. Judges have been known to be wrong and basically flat out rob people.Comment
-
i agree if u watch the Dela Hoya v Mayweather fight Oscar didnt win those early rounds on effective aggressivness because although he was a aggressive i would'nt say he was effective he was just more active in those roundsIts scored on EFFECTIVE AGGRESSION not just aggression alone. See this what I was talking about. Fighters getting credit for just being aggressive when that **** is doing nothing at all. Read how fights are scored over again and you will see what I'm talking about.
Go on youtube and listen to when Harold Lederman reads the rules and scoring for a fight I will bet you all of my points he says that part of the fight will be scored on EFFECTIVE AGGRESSION not just being aggresive.Comment
Comment