Whose resume is better, Floyd's or Oscar's

**jabsRstiff** · 01-03-2008, 03:17 PM

I voted "even".

Oscar has faced mostly better comp.....while Floyd has been more dominant.

**Parody** · 01-03-2008, 03:17 PM

Do losses count?

**RichCCFC** · 01-03-2008, 03:19 PM

Floyd by a bit!

Floyd would of beaten Tito @ 147 and Mosley @ 147 and 154 I think.

**Sin City** · 01-03-2008, 03:20 PM

Originally posted by JoeCalzaghe

Floyd by a bit!

Floyd would of beaten Tito @ 147 and Mosley @ 147 and 154 I think.

I'm guessing your one of the thick heads that think Oscar's career started at welter

**Slotff** · 01-03-2008, 03:21 PM

Oscar by a little for me.

**jabsRstiff** · 01-03-2008, 03:23 PM

Originally posted by Sin City

I'm guessing your one of the thick heads that think Oscar's career started at welter

Corrales & Castillo were better & more dangerous fighters than anyone Osacr faced at 130-135.
Don't get me wrong, Oscar was something in those days.....but Floyd fought better people down at those weight classes.

**TheGreatA** · 01-03-2008, 03:23 PM

Roger Mayweather has fought better competition than both.

**RichCCFC** · 01-03-2008, 03:23 PM

Originally posted by Sin City

I'm guessing your one of the thick heads that think Oscar's career started at welter

?????????????????

**Parody** · 01-03-2008, 03:24 PM

Originally posted by TheManchine

Roger Mayweather has fought better competition than both.

End of thread. Why does Bill Gates still make dem ****ing Computers?

Whose resume is better, Floyd's or Oscar's