Cotto is too easy for PBF

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • oldgringo
    Ellis
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jul 2004
    • 12747
    • 968
    • 453
    • 30,064

    #21
    Originally posted by GrizzleBoy
    No need for you to be so "on the defensive" considering most of the comments have been peoples honest opinions with no trash talking, save one person talking about hattons intelligence.

    I personally think Floyd is too fast for Cotto. I can't remember anyone giving Floyd the amount of trouble and actual clean effective hits that Zab Judah dealt him in their fight, which leads me to beleive that someone with similar or better boxing skills is needed to give Floyd trouble.

    Floyd doesn't need a pressure fighter. He loves fighting pressure fighters because its easier for his countering style.

    Someone who could hit him with long straight shots and stay out of range with a good deal of speed and boxing skill is what is needed to beat floyd because it would force him to be the one to apply the pressure opening up more chances for the other boxer to be the counter puncher instead.

    Basically reversing the roles.

    Just my opinion.
    Hey here we go. Thanks for the response.

    I'm not "on the defensive" bud, I am incapable of being riled up by stuff like this. Been here too long for that. My post was used with the hope that someone would respond with a post offering something than the norm.

    Judah was able to sustain an effective out put against Floyd until Floyd figured out what he was doing, like he does with mostly everyone, then he proceeded to turn the fight around in the middle stages of the bout. Judah was unable to change what he was doing with Mayweather. Hatton was unable to adjust with Floyd as well. He was unable to give Floyd different looks and kept going back to his security blanket hook and clinch tactics. Floyd is a damn genius at figuring out his opponents attack and interpreting cues.

    Cotto has shown that he is able to adjust to his opponent to get an edge in the fight, much like Floyd does. Now he may not be quite as good as Floyd in this regard, but he is certainly more capable of capitalizing on that intangible than Judah and Hatton. Cotto has fought just about every style imaginable which has allowed him to change his own make up throughout the course of a fight. Floyd is on a different level, but it certainly helps that Cotto has had this experience.

    It's not always necessarily significant that Floyd is too fast for Cotto or any of his other opponents. The thing that sets Floyd apart is that he's consistent with his quickness and he doesn't fade. Hatton showed that he could close distance and use his own speed to be effective against Floyd, but he could only do it for so long. Floyd NEVER dropped off. The same was true for Judah. Cotto is different in my opinion because he is every bit as deliberate and persistent as Floyd is with his attack. I don't believe it's a coincidence that Cotto's last 3-4 opponents, all of which where supposed to be much quicker of hand and foot than Cotto, found Miguel's hands to be MUCH faster than anticipated. He throws compact punches and is now very effective with his straight shots with either hand.

    Cotto may not have the foot speed that Hatton or Judah possessed, but he understands elements of spacing with respect to the ring and his opponent. Miguel is one of the very best I have seen in recent memory when cutting off the ring because of this. He may not have quick feet, but he is able to effectively cut off the ring and close distance because he knows the correct angles to take to his opponent and he is always in position to punch.

    Your given pressure fighter is going to be eaten up by Mayweather. A pressure fighter who can change their attack throughout the course of a fight can give Floyd hell though. I don't believe that Cotto is just another run-of-the-mill come forward brawler. His 31 wins against strong competition should warrant him more respect.
    Someone who could hit him with long straight shots and stay out of range with a good deal of speed and boxing skill is what is needed to beat floyd because it would force him to be the one to apply the pressure opening up more chances for the other boxer to be the counter puncher instead.
    I agree with this. I wasn't trying to point out that Williams would be a less difficult or easy fight for Floyd, I was simply trying to induce some unique responses. My beef was with people CONTINUING to state that Cotto would be an easy fight while largely failing to explain why. As you can see from my lengthy response, I am looking for something more in-depth than, "Mayweather is faster", or, "cotto is easy to be hit and has a questionable chin". A bit redundant, don't you think?

    Paul Williams may be able to do to Floyd what Dio Hurtado was able to do to Pernell Whitaker. Yes, many aspects of that fight were different, but the skill and size/length comparison is valid. Dio Hurtado was no average fighter off the street. He was able to take Pernell out of his comfort zone with his length and sharp punching ability. Williams may be able to do the same if he is able to dictate the spatial relationship, using his work rate and variety to out work Floyd.

    In part 2, I'll tell you *stylistically* how I think Cotto would be a very tough test for Floyd. A bit long winded, but I think we can get some constructive dialogue going here.

    Comment

    • jabsRstiff
      ! ! ! !
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Jun 2004
      • 8964
      • 498
      • 136
      • 16,167

      #22
      My feeling is that Cotto is too predictable for Floyd Mayweather. The kind of guy who will bother Floyd will be the one who brings something he's never seen before.....& will disrupt Floyd's timing & control. Cotto is probably the most well-balanced guy that Floyd could face, but that's not what will get it done. Also, the boxing skills that Cotto surprisingly showed against Mosley, would only help him survive a losing battle with Floyd, not turn it around.

      Comment

      • Pugilistic™
        MV3
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Nov 2006
        • 9848
        • 324
        • 305
        • 16,773

        #23
        Originally posted by blacksky
        I want to see Mayweather tested against Paul Williams.

        How would he fair against someone with a good jab.

        Cotto seems to be the easier option, he is too slow, has a questionable chin and would get UD'd or KO'd.

        Alot of people see Cotto as the danger man at Welterweight. I think Williams and Cintron are more dangerous.
        cotto already proved he has a decent chin. if he can take shots from mosley, he can take shots from mayweather.

        as for speed cotto's speed matched up with shane's so he ain't slow.

        the reason i see mayweather winning is because of cottos poor defense and mayweather will hit him with right hand leads etc all night. he is also too good defensively for cotto. mayweather would win a UD

        Comment

        • blacksky
          Contender
          • Nov 2007
          • 473
          • 64
          • 15
          • 6,564

          #24
          Originally posted by oldgringo
          My beef was with people CONTINUING to state that Cotto would be an easy fight while largely failing to explain why. As you can see from my lengthy response, I am looking for something more in-depth than, "Mayweather is faster", or, "cotto is easy to be hit and has a questionable chin".
          maybe we dont want to spend 15 minutes typing each post.

          MAYBE we want to state the obvious.

          MAYBE its none of your ****ing business what people say

          Comment

          • Smunoz
            Contender
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • Nov 2007
            • 151
            • 3
            • 0
            • 6,185

            #25
            Originally posted by oldgringo
            Hey here we go. Thanks for the response.

            I'm not "on the defensive" bud, I am incapable of being riled up by stuff like this. Been here too long for that. My post was used with the hope that someone would respond with a post offering something than the norm.

            Judah was able to sustain an effective out put against Floyd until Floyd figured out what he was doing, like he does with mostly everyone, then he proceeded to turn the fight around in the middle stages of the bout. Judah was unable to change what he was doing with Mayweather. Hatton was unable to adjust with Floyd as well. He was unable to give Floyd different looks and kept going back to his security blanket hook and clinch tactics. Floyd is a damn genius at figuring out his opponents attack and interpreting cues.

            Cotto has shown that he is able to adjust to his opponent to get an edge in the fight, much like Floyd does. Now he may not be quite as good as Floyd in this regard, but he is certainly more capable of capitalizing on that intangible than Judah and Hatton. Cotto has fought just about every style imaginable which has allowed him to change his own make up throughout the course of a fight. Floyd is on a different level, but it certainly helps that Cotto has had this experience.

            It's not always necessarily significant that Floyd is too fast for Cotto or any of his other opponents. The thing that sets Floyd apart is that he's consistent with his quickness and he doesn't fade. Hatton showed that he could close distance and use his own speed to be effective against Floyd, but he could only do it for so long. Floyd NEVER dropped off. The same was true for Judah. Cotto is different in my opinion because he is every bit as deliberate and persistent as Floyd is with his attack. I don't believe it's a coincidence that Cotto's last 3-4 opponents, all of which where supposed to be much quicker of hand and foot than Cotto, found Miguel's hands to be MUCH faster than anticipated. He throws compact punches and is now very effective with his straight shots with either hand.

            Cotto may not have the foot speed that Hatton or Judah possessed, but he understands elements of spacing with respect to the ring and his opponent. Miguel is one of the very best I have seen in recent memory when cutting off the ring because of this. He may not have quick feet, but he is able to effectively cut off the ring and close distance because he knows the correct angles to take to his opponent and he is always in position to punch.

            Your given pressure fighter is going to be eaten up by Mayweather. A pressure fighter who can change their attack throughout the course of a fight can give Floyd hell though. I don't believe that Cotto is just another run-of-the-mill come forward brawler. His 31 wins against strong competition should warrant him more respect.


            I agree with this. I wasn't trying to point out that Williams would be a less difficult or easy fight for Floyd, I was simply trying to induce some unique responses. My beef was with people CONTINUING to state that Cotto would be an easy fight while largely failing to explain why. As you can see from my lengthy response, I am looking for something more in-depth than, "Mayweather is faster", or, "cotto is easy to be hit and has a questionable chin". A bit redundant, don't you think?

            Paul Williams may be able to do to Floyd what Dio Hurtado was able to do to Pernell Whitaker. Yes, many aspects of that fight were different, but the skill and size/length comparison is valid. Dio Hurtado was no average fighter off the street. He was able to take Pernell out of his comfort zone with his length and sharp punching ability. Williams may be able to do the same if he is able to dictate the spatial relationship, using his work rate and variety to out work Floyd.

            In part 2, I'll tell you *stylistically* how I think Cotto would be a very tough test for Floyd. A bit long winded, but I think we can get some constructive dialogue going here.

            thats one of the best responses that i ever seen in this forums. I agree with you in anything that you said. With all you said i saved my thoughs because are almost the same. I look forward to have the oportunity to talk with you in this or other topics later.

            Comment

            • oldgringo
              Ellis
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Jul 2004
              • 12747
              • 968
              • 453
              • 30,064

              #26
              Originally posted by blacksky
              maybe we dont want to spend 15 minutes typing each post.

              MAYBE we want to state the obvious.

              MAYBE its none of your ****ing business what people say
              You have that right.

              Right, I forgot that the popular opinion was almighty.

              This is a public forum you jagoff. Go create the "Floyd Mayweather - King of the World" forum if you and your buddies want to participate in an online Floyd circle jerk.

              Good of you to try and respond though. At least I have your attention.

              Comment

              • Smunoz
                Contender
                Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                • Nov 2007
                • 151
                • 3
                • 0
                • 6,185

                #27
                I think the people that said that cotto lose a fight with floyd only because they think floyd is too fast for cotto is the same people that said that cotto will lose to mosley because he too slow in comparition to mosley. Boxing is way more than hands speed. And there is a lot of tactics that can be use to neutralize hands speed. Cotto has fight three guys that are more quick than him. Mosley , Judah, Maliggnagi. And who was the outcome? Do you really believe hands speed was a determinent factor in the fight? Give me you thoughs.

                Comment

                • blacksky
                  Contender
                  • Nov 2007
                  • 473
                  • 64
                  • 15
                  • 6,564

                  #28
                  Mosely could have boxed Cotto's ears off. Instead he stood right in front of him for almost the entire fight and didn`t get up on his toes.

                  When he was on his toes, Cotto looked slow, ponderous and easy to hit

                  Comment

                  • GrizzleBoy
                    Interim Champion
                    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                    • Jul 2007
                    • 655
                    • 39
                    • 4
                    • 7,224

                    #29
                    Originally posted by oldgringo
                    Hey here we go. Thanks for the response.

                    I'm not "on the defensive" bud, I am incapable of being riled up by stuff like this. Been here too long for that. My post was used with the hope that someone would respond with a post offering something than the norm.

                    Judah was able to sustain an effective out put against Floyd until Floyd figured out what he was doing, like he does with mostly everyone, then he proceeded to turn the fight around in the middle stages of the bout. Judah was unable to change what he was doing with Mayweather. Hatton was unable to adjust with Floyd as well. He was unable to give Floyd different looks and kept going back to his security blanket hook and clinch tactics. Floyd is a damn genius at figuring out his opponents attack and interpreting cues.

                    Cotto has shown that he is able to adjust to his opponent to get an edge in the fight, much like Floyd does. Now he may not be quite as good as Floyd in this regard, but he is certainly more capable of capitalizing on that intangible than Judah and Hatton. Cotto has fought just about every style imaginable which has allowed him to change his own make up throughout the course of a fight. Floyd is on a different level, but it certainly helps that Cotto has had this experience.

                    It's not always necessarily significant that Floyd is too fast for Cotto or any of his other opponents. The thing that sets Floyd apart is that he's consistent with his quickness and he doesn't fade. Hatton showed that he could close distance and use his own speed to be effective against Floyd, but he could only do it for so long. Floyd NEVER dropped off. The same was true for Judah. Cotto is different in my opinion because he is every bit as deliberate and persistent as Floyd is with his attack. I don't believe it's a coincidence that Cotto's last 3-4 opponents, all of which where supposed to be much quicker of hand and foot than Cotto, found Miguel's hands to be MUCH faster than anticipated. He throws compact punches and is now very effective with his straight shots with either hand.

                    Cotto may not have the foot speed that Hatton or Judah possessed, but he understands elements of spacing with respect to the ring and his opponent. Miguel is one of the very best I have seen in recent memory when cutting off the ring because of this. He may not have quick feet, but he is able to effectively cut off the ring and close distance because he knows the correct angles to take to his opponent and he is always in position to punch.

                    Your given pressure fighter is going to be eaten up by Mayweather. A pressure fighter who can change their attack throughout the course of a fight can give Floyd hell though. I don't believe that Cotto is just another run-of-the-mill come forward brawler. His 31 wins against strong competition should warrant him more respect.


                    I agree with this. I wasn't trying to point out that Williams would be a less difficult or easy fight for Floyd, I was simply trying to induce some unique responses. My beef was with people CONTINUING to state that Cotto would be an easy fight while largely failing to explain why. As you can see from my lengthy response, I am looking for something more in-depth than, "Mayweather is faster", or, "cotto is easy to be hit and has a questionable chin". A bit redundant, don't you think?

                    Paul Williams may be able to do to Floyd what Dio Hurtado was able to do to Pernell Whitaker. Yes, many aspects of that fight were different, but the skill and size/length comparison is valid. Dio Hurtado was no average fighter off the street. He was able to take Pernell out of his comfort zone with his length and sharp punching ability. Williams may be able to do the same if he is able to dictate the spatial relationship, using his work rate and variety to out work Floyd.

                    In part 2, I'll tell you *stylistically* how I think Cotto would be a very tough test for Floyd. A bit long winded, but I think we can get some constructive dialogue going here.
                    I agree with other person who praised this post and props for not taking the first part of my reply the wrong way.

                    Im gonna go watch some mire Cotto fights and wait for Part 2.

                    Comment

                    • Double
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Sep 2004
                      • 1538
                      • 47
                      • 5
                      • 10,509

                      #30
                      I don't think it would be easy but Floyd could block or move out of the way of most of cotto's shots. Floyd uses his accuracy to pot shot cotto per usual. Cotto got tired in the last 3 - 4 rounds against Mosely so Floyd would step it up much like he did against Hatton and win the final 4 rds. Floyd UD.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP