Calzaghe is overrated

[The Gunner]

he ko'd trinidad, old school bernard would have ko'd or atleast kd pavlik in that fight but he didn't even come close even with all the punches he was landing flush on pavlik.

Trindad was a Welterweight naturaly that does not come close to what he done to Pavlik or Tarver. Tarver and Pavlik would both have smashed Tito because like Bernard they were just to big for him.

Nards win over Tito is what it is....The fight the sprungboard his career. Nothing more and nothing less.

[Kastrioti]

My motive is putting boxers in their rightful place. Calzaghe is not nearly as great as he is being made out to be. There are fighters today that have accomplished more then Calzaghe and are not even on the p4p list. That is sad.

Is it really THAT hard to answer?

Why are you not giving Calzaghe credit for beating someone you said he needed to beat in order to be proven?

[Kastrioti]

Let me put Hopkins' name in the question so maybe it's clearer to you.... lol

Why are you not giving Calzaghe credit for beating Hopkins when you said he needed to beat Hopkins in order to be proven?

[Dan...]

Is it really THAT hard to answer?

Why are you not giving Calzaghe credit for beating someone you said he needed to beat in order to be proven?

I think everyone knows the answer and understands your point.

[The Gunner]

Is it really THAT hard to answer?

Why are you not giving Calzaghe credit for beating someone you said he needed to beat in order to be proven?

The guys a fool....It wouldn't matter who Calzaghe beat he'd still hate!

[-Swizzy-]

........ Are you just trying to act ****** now? Let me rephrase my question for the last time, hopefully I'll get a real answer.

Why are you not giving Calzaghe credit for beating someone you said he needed to beat in order to be proven?

you want me to give Calzaghe credit for beating a 42 year old? he beat Hopkins that is good for him. It is a good win but nothing more. It isn't a "great" win. Greatness requires defeating greatness. Calzaghe hasn't done that yet. Calzaghe doesn't even deserve to be in the HOF.

[Kastrioti]

I think everyone knows the answer and understands your point.

Yea you're right, sorry I'm probably sounding like an ass lol.

[-Swizzy-]

Trindad was a Welterweight naturaly that does not come close to what he done to Pavlik or Tarver. Tarver and Pavlik would both have smashed Tito because like Bernard they were just to big for him.

Nards win over Tito is what it is....The fight the sprungboard his career. Nothing more and nothing less.

oh look at this. so now Trinidad is a welterweight<--- thats your excuse? are you seriously nit picking that ko victory but yet boosting Calzaghe's victory over a 42 year old?

[Dan...]

Yea you're right, sorry I'm probably sounding like an ass lol.

You're not, it is just that we all know Calzaghe could find the solution to world hunger and this guy would still write him off as a bum. What is the point?

[-Swizzy-]

You're not, it is just that we all know Calzaghe could find the solution to world hunger and this guy would still write him off as a bum. What is the point?

Calzaghe could be 0-55(55ko losses) and you would say that he is the GOAT.