Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Should the fight be reviewed?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Should the fight be reviewed?

    It is clear to me that cortez was completely biased and did not let hatton fight his fight. he ignored floyds constant elbow use which is illegal and blatantly broke up the fight when hatton had floyd buckled. i think the nevada state athletic commision should look into wrong doing and possibly rule it a no contest if it can be proved that cortez was payed off. i believe that the judges should be investigated too because hatton won at least 3 and maybe 4 rounds, with all the judges giving him less than 3. i am a floyd fan but i did not want to see him win like that. agree or dissagree?
    38
    agree
    23.68%
    9
    disagree
    76.32%
    29
    Last edited by boxing_pundit85; 12-12-2007, 01:13 AM.

  • #2
    Originally posted by boxing_pundit85 View Post
    It is clear to me that cortez was completely biased and did not let hatton fight his fight. he ignored floyds constant elbow use which is illegal and blatantly broke up the fight when hatton had floyd buckled. i think the nevada state athletic commision should look into wrong doing and possibly rule it a no contest if it can be proved that cortez was payed off. i believe that the judges should be investigated too because hatton won at least 3 and maybe 4 rounds. what a joke it was. agree or dissagree?
    I think its time to leave this fight be, ricky got beat fair and square as much as it hurts me to say so.
    Lets move on to 2008 and the ressurection of ricky Hatton

    Comment


    • #3
      H Got Ktfo...its Over.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by boxing_pundit85 View Post
        It is clear to me that cortez was completely biased and did not let hatton fight his fight. he ignored floyds constant elbow use which is illegal and blatantly broke up the fight when hatton had floyd buckled. i think the nevada state athletic commision should look into wrong doing and possibly rule it a no contest if it can be proved that cortez was payed off. i believe that the judges should be investigated too because hatton won at least 3 and maybe 4 rounds. what a joke it was. agree or dissagree?
        uh WOW cant believe someone with a floyd avatar is doing FREE THINKING!!!

        Anyway, they should investigate it as a front for going after the organized crime ring that runs boxing anyway.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by BmoreBrawler View Post
          uh WOW cant believe someone with a floyd avatar is doing FREE THINKING!!!

          Anyway, they should investigate it as a front for going after the organized crime ring that runs boxing anyway.
          Yeah review this LOL

          [IMG]http://i33.***********.com/albums/d59/RodBarker007/4173a305e4ad79264a3e8e9e641dae30-ge.jpg[/IMG]

          Comment


          • #6
            The same judges gave Oscar his gift decision and Cortez WAS biased. Hatton has even said it (no disrespect to Floyd).

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by boxing_pundit85 View Post
              It is clear to me that cortez was completely biased and did not let hatton fight his fight. he ignored floyds constant elbow use which is illegal and blatantly broke up the fight when hatton had floyd buckled. i think the nevada state athletic commision should look into wrong doing and possibly rule it a no contest if it can be proved that cortez was payed off. i believe that the judges should be investigated too because hatton won at least 3 and maybe 4 rounds, with all the judges giving him less than 3. i am a floyd fan but i did not want to see him win like that. agree or dissagree?
              Disagree and I honestly don't think you're too bright if you insist that it would have made a difference and you honestly don't know boxing if you think hitting and holding is legal.

              Comment


              • #8
                There's no point in reviewing the fight. This isn't football where you can overturn a call. He got knocked out, not robbed of a decision. If the referee wasn't Cortez, he still wouldn't have won. Mayweather was just too good, I give Hatton a heck of a lot of credit for bringing out the best Floyd Mayweather though.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by sonofisis View Post
                  Disagree and I honestly don't think you're too bright if you insist that it would have made a difference and you honestly don't know boxing if you think hitting and holding is legal.
                  shetup ***git. dude makes unbiased posts at times where you see no fault in anything Floyd does. your a ***gity ***git.

                  anyway, true, cortez not allowing Hatton to work inside may have affected SOME of what happened, but Floyd had Ricky's number. He was walking in to so many right hands that a set up and knock out was bound to happen. let the fight be, let Floyd take a rest and choose his next opponent.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by 2501 View Post
                    anyway, true, cortez not allowing Hatton to work inside may have affected SOME of what happened, but Floyd had Ricky's number. He was walking in to so many right hands that a set up and knock out was bound to happen. let the fight be, let Floyd take a rest and choose his next opponent.
                    The right hands weren't getting away until Cortez split them up. Cortez HANDED Mayweather the perfect position about 1 metre from HAtton with Hatton rushing in after a break-up.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP