Who else thinks Guzman would make PAC look silly?

[Papa Ace]

im not ''Crillz'' and thats all there is to it. i don't have to prove nothing to an idiot. believe what ever makes you happy!

LMAO, its bad enough you created an alt now you have to copy grayfist's line. ajajaja... ure a funny one crillz really u crack me up

[slicksouthpaw16]

That's better...

****y is a guy who makes definite statements out of speculations. Remember the thread title?

"That's better" is accurate. It an apt description. It is not ****y.

wrong again,

the thread title is my opinion. you said yourself that we should should respect each other's opinion. you called mine silly and inaccurate. (thread title) so make up your mind. i admitted that i was wrong and you had to go and say something ****y.

[slicksouthpaw16]

LMAO, its bad enough you created an alt now you have to copy grayfist's line. ajajaja... ure a funny one crillz really u crack me up

for now on, if its not boxing related, we don't have anything to talk about. COVERSTAION OVER

[grayfist]

wrong again,

the thread title is my opinion. you said yourself that we should should respect each other's opinion. you called mine silly and inaccurate. (thread title) so make up your mind. i admitted that i was wrong and you had to go and say something ****y.

****y is a guy who begins a reply with "wrong again," then ends his reply with an admission that he was wrong.

****y is a guy who says clearly that he does not "waste... time" replying to the thread he begun.

I called my response ("That's better") accurate. I did not refer to any of what you've said as as accurate or "inaccurate". So, it is not I who should make up my mind.

I simply called silly your expressed certitude that Pacquiao "will look silly". I clearly stated in my first post that the presumtion upon which that observation is based is silly. It became sillier still when you repeated that certitude in response to my first post.

[Papa Ace]

for now on, if its not boxing related, we don't have anything to talk about. COVERSTAION OVER

Ok with me. At least I know you're guilty. COVERSTAION?

[slicksouthpaw16]

****y is a guy who begins a reply with "wrong again," then ends his reply with an admission that he was wrong.

****y is a guy who says clearly that he does not "waste... time" replying to the thread he begun.

I called my response ("That's better") accurate. I did not refer to any of what you've said as as accurate or "inaccurate". So, it is not I who should make up my mind.

I simply called silly your expressed certitude that Pacquiao "will look silly". It became sillier still when you repeated that certitude in response to my first post.

actually,

''****y'' is a poster who won't even appreeciate when another poster admits he was wrong. the point is that i admitted that i was wrong and yet you still act like i owe you something.

[grayfist]

actually,

''****y'' is a poster who won't even appreeciate when another poster admits he was wrong. the point is that i admitted that i was wrong and yet you still act like i owe you something.

I do not believe anybody owes me anything and I do not act as if anyone does.

It is presumtuous to think that I do. And for that, ****y.

I do not put labels on people. People do and I reply using the very labels they use. The people who put the labels are the ones who are ****y.

It is difficult to accept and/or "appreciate" the admission of one for having been wrong when such is placed as the last line of a paragraph that begins with an accusation that I was "wrong again". It is a difficulty not ****iness.

[slicksouthpaw16]

I do not believe anybody owes me anything and I do not act as if anyone does.

It is presumtuous to think that I do. And for that, ****y.

I do not put labels on people. People do and I reply using the very labels they use. The people who put the labels are the ones who are ****y.

It is difficult to accept and/or "appreciate" the admission of one for having been wrong when such is placed as the last line of a paragraph that begins with an accusation that I was "wrong again". It is a difficulty not ****iness.

and still, i think he would make PAC look silly with his counter punching IMO. and if you disagree, fine. i have already said enough.

[grayfist]

and still, i think he would make PAC look silly with his counter punching IMO. and if you disagree, fine. i have already said enough.

Of course you think that. It's clear that you always will. It is foolish to expect anything else. After all, weren't you the one who said something about it being a waste of time to try and convince people...?

As for your having said enough, I think, you've said more than you should have. And that's what has gotten us to this point. But of course, that's only my opinion.

You can have the last word, if having that is what you want.

[slicksouthpaw16]

Of course you think that. It's clear that you always will.

You've said more than you should have.

You have the last word, if having that is what you want.

i don't want the last word. actually you had the last word when even i admitted i was wrong, it was not enough for you. you pretty much had me beat right there. LOL so cong****!