Who else thinks Guzman would make PAC look silly?

[slicksouthpaw16]

nice alt crillz.. youre really a points whore

what??? i aint no alt. him saying exactly what i meant and me agreeing with him makes me an alt?? and as you can see, i don't have much points. why am i even responding to this. you're a

[Papa Ace]

what??? i aint no alt. him saying exactly what i meant and me agreeing with him makes me an alt?? and as you can see, i don't have much points. why am i even responding to this. you're a

yeah i can smell from here youre crillz.. i got u exposed jajajaja

[slicksouthpaw16]

yeah i can smell from here youre crillz.. i got u exposed jajajaja

man you can believe what you want to. and what is an alt anyway? i don't get these slangs.

[grayfist]

again, Guzman would make PAC look silly, its just the wrong style for PAC. and im not even responding to all of that stuff you wrote. it would just be a waste of time. there is no convining people who are stuck in their own opinion. just look at what Crillz wrote. he explained everything perfect.

One begins a discussion and then says he does not want to waste his time responding to people's reactions claiming "there is no convincing people who are stuck in their own opinions"?

Now, THAT is silly.

You begin a thread in a forum expecting all types of responses. That's part of the purpose of starting a thread. If you think responding to replies is a waste of time, why start a thread? Isn't that not just LOOKING silly, but, outright BEING SILLY?

You presume that there is "no convincing people who are stuck in their own opinion." That is as silly a presumption as the one that you begun this thread with.

You say I should look at what crilzz wrote. I did. And it seems to me that while he has his points that I can respect, his opinions are far from perfect-- or perfect only in the eyes of someone who joined this site four months ago and thinks he is sufficiently steeped in the fight game as to be God's gift to this site, and thus, cannot suffer contrary opinion even lightly.

As far as I know, Guzman and Pacquiao has not fought; neither has Guzman and Marquez. Anything said about those fights are pure conjecture. So, anyobody's guess is as good as anybody's.

Your guess is that Pacquiao will look silly against Guzman. I am saying, THAT is a silly thought and took the effort and time to explain why.

That's all there is to it.

[Papa Ace]

what??? i aint no alt. him saying exactly what i meant and me agreeing with him makes me an alt?? and as you can see, i don't have much points. why am i even responding to this. you're a

man you can believe what you want to. and what is an alt anyway? i don't get these slangs.

geez i havent seen some very good self-ownage recently this tops it all

crillz brotha youre doin good keeping up this thread for points now you have to create an alt, you points whore

@ grayfist, dont bother explaining to him he's just trying to fire up the thread for points sake

[slicksouthpaw16]

One begins a discussion and then says he does not want to waste his time responding to people's reactions claiming "there is no convincing people who are stuck in their own opinions"?

Now, THAT is silly.

You begin a thread in a forum expecting all types of responses. That's part of the purpose of starting a thread. If you think responding to replies is a waste of time, why start a thread? Isn't that not just LOOKING silly, but, outright BEING SILLY?

You presume that there is "no convincing people who are stuck in their own opinion." That is as silly a presumption as the one that you begun this thread with.

You say I should look at what crilzz wrote. I did. And it seems to me that while he has his points that I can respect, his opinions are far from perfect-- or perfect only in the eyes of someone who joined this site four months ago and think he is sufficiently steeped in the fight game as to be God's gift to this site, and thus, cannot suffer contrary opinion even lightly.

As far as I know, Guzman and Pacquiao has not fought; neither has Guzman and Marquez. Anything said about those fights are pure conjecture. So, anyobody's guess is as good as anybody's.

Your guess is that Pacquiao will look silly against Guzman. I am saying, THAT is a silly thought. That's all there is to it.

i respect your opinion. and when i said that he said everything perfect, i meant that he said it perfect in my opinion.

[grayfist]

again, Guzman would make PAC look silly, its just the wrong style for PAC. and im not even responding to all of that stuff you wrote. it would just be a waste of time. there is no convining people who are stuck in their own opinion. just look at what Crillz wrote. he explained everything perfect.

i respect your opinion. and when i said that he said everything perfect, i meant that he said it perfect in my opinion.

That's better...

[slicksouthpaw16]

geez i havent seen some very good self-ownage recently this tops it all

crillz brotha youre doin good keeping up this thread for points now you have to create an alt, you points whore

@ grayfist, dont bother explaining to him he's just trying to fire up the thread for points sake

im not ''Crillz'' and thats all there is to it. i don't have to prove nothing to an idiot. believe what ever makes you happy!

[slicksouthpaw16]

That's better...

''thats better''? now thats being ****y. you should have said ''ok i understand'' and been done with it.

[grayfist]

''thats better''? now thats being ****y. you should have said ''ok i understand'' and been done with it.

****y is a guy who makes definite statements out of speculations. Remember the thread title?

****y is also a guy who begins a thread and refuses to "waste... time" replying.

"That's better" is accurate. It's an apt description. It is not ****y.