Hopkins P4P ...Why?
Collapse
-
Double standard. Who has Calz fought as good as Hopkins, EVER? Better yet, who has Calz fought EVER that is as good as the last 3 people Bernard fought? Anyone will due..
Comment
-
Kessler is 14th in The Ring's P4P rankings. Hardly a lifetime away is it?Comment
-
Comment
-
Okay, but you act like this doesn't refute (at least on paper) the above comment that I was responding to, since both Winky and De la were rated much higher, and in fact, Winky still is. I'm not sure where either De La or Kessler stand now.Comment
-
HAHAHAHAHA! I've never even heard of Kessler before this fight, and surely he was never the champ of his division as these other two were, with Tarver and Taylor both beating legends along with the other top light heavys, for Tarver. Kessler beat a bunch of nobodies in a crap division. Both Taylor and Tarver were still rated higher than Kessler during their reign, not to mention were RECOGNIZED champs . Please tell me this is bias?Last edited by sonofisis; 11-05-2007, 11:24 AM.Comment
-
Well since you have just admitted that you hadn't heard of Kessler until this fight where the hell do you get the knowledge to judge him from? Boxrec?HAHAHAHAHA! I've never even heard of Kessler before this fight, and surely he was never the champ of his division as these other two were, with Tarver beating a legend along with the other top Middle weights. Kessler beat a bunch of nobodies in a crap division. Please tell me this is bias?Comment
-
What "knowledge"? The reason I know that DLH, Tarver, and Taylor were all rated higher than him is simple....... because Kessler was nowhere near them in the rankings, hence, a nobody. He just wasn't there to see. Why is that contradictory? I'm also not the one saying absurd things, like Kessler is better than Taylor or Tarver, as that is the most desperate attempt to blow up another fighter based on his comp, that I've probably ever seen.
LMAO @ Kessler..
Comment
-
Comment