JMM is overrated by Ring Magazine

[Kball15]

Then remove, Mayweather, Hopkins, and Pacquiao.

why?

I thought Mayweather convincingly beat DLH, Baldomir, and Judah. all pretty clear and obvious

Hopkins dominated Tarver and won a close but comfortable decision of Wright.

And Pacquiao just dominated Barrera, Solis, Morales twice....

[Chups]

I havent come across a person who thought John should have won the fight.

That coward should get out of his ****hole and fight oustide his territory. JMM clearly won that fight with John.

[eazy_mas]

JMM is most definetly one of the 10 most talented in the game, and if you deny that then you havent seen enough of him.

BUT, i can see why some may not want to put him among the top 10 p4p, cause he only has one good win in his last few

He beat chris john apparently, i didnt see it, and got jobbed.

And he put on a great performance against Barrera and won handily i thought. And now he's gonna batter a very good fighter around the ring for 12 rounds, maybe even less.

And i definetly am gonna pick JMM to beat Pacquiao if they rematch.

see the HL of the fight he didnt beat Chris John. Chris John was taking control of the fight most of the time. and JMM is trying to stalking him and then throw a straight right and John was 10 feet away. JMM was not effective in this fight at all he didnt use the jab, if he did he could have even KOed Chris John by conering him and making it a brawl but he didnt.

[moy22487]

then pacman should not be put number 2 when hatton, joe cal, joan guzman, and cotton have no Ls and pacman has a D and some Ls in his record

[joepal]

then pacman should not be put number 2 when hatton, joe cal, joan guzman, and cotton have no Ls and pacman has a D and some Ls in his record

Pac is number one. I think the Ring just made a typo.

[moy22487]

Pac is number one. I think the Ring just made a typo.

he is the best fighter to watch, but if you dive into there past floyds has a 0 in the L columb and i belive pac has 3 or 4

[kadyo's]

then pacman should not be put number 2 when hatton, joe cal, joan guzman, and cotton have no Ls and pacman has a D and some Ls in his record

I kind of agree with you. Pac should try run for congressman again and forget about boxing. He's a good singer and a true thespian so he has a lot of fallbacks in case he lost in the election again.

[moy22487]

I kind of agree with you. Pac should try run for congressman again and forget about boxing. He's a good singer and a true thespian so he has a lot of fallbacks in case he lost in the election again.

naw i cant let him go as a champion, he is to much fun to watch (except for MAB rematch)
im just saying if jmm is over rated because of that Questionable L to john then other fighters shouldnt be up there

[eazy_mas]

Pac is number one. I think the Ring just made a typo.

Because they are American

[ferocity]

why?

I thought Mayweather convincingly beat DLH, Baldomir, and Judah. all pretty clear and obvious

Hopkins dominated Tarver and won a close but comfortable decision of Wright.

And Pacquiao just dominated Barrera, Solis, Morales twice....

Mayweather had trouble with some fighters more so then others. He didn't beat Castillo and he had his hands full with Delahoya -could of gone either way, says alot for an old Delahoya.

Hopkins lost to Taylor, strugled with Winky and Mercado.

Pacquiao has gotten ko'd and lost to Marquez.

These may be old fights but they were Judeing Marquez on old fights.