floyd greatest of our generation?

[THe TRiNiTY]

Wow. So you're making a distinction between defending your positive opinion about Floyd and defending Floyd. Then you self-servingly claim that most people think that you make decent arguments.

Incredible. The things nuthuggers say just to defend Floyd.

I didn't say most people would agree with what I said about Mayweather. I don't worry myself with that. They're entitled to disagree. That's a good thing that everyone doesn't agree with everyone. Boards like this wouldn't exist. I'm saying, a rational person atleast would say, I'm stating my own opinion in a decent manner. Regardless of if they agree.

So tell me, what is nuthugger-ish about that? Why are you so blind that you have to sink to the level of insulting a well thought out argument with childish 5th grade insults?

[joepal]

I didn't say most people would agree with what I said about Mayweather. I don't worry myself with that. They're entitled to disagree. That's a good thing that everyone doesn't agree with everyone. Boards like this wouldn't exist. I'm saying, a rational person atleast would say, I'm stating my own opinion in a decent manner. Regardless of if they agree.

So tell me, what is nuthugger-ish about that? Why are you so blind that you have to sink to the level of insulting a well thought out argument with childish 5th grade insults?

Well-thought out argument? Are you frigging kidding me? Why do you have to self-congratulate yourself every now-and-then? What an insecure loser you are.

Do I also detect an "I'm-entitled-to-my-opinion-so-back-off" tone from you? So are you saying I can't call you out on your opinion anymore? This has to be the white flag in our discussion, as it seems you dont want part of it anymore.

What is nuthuggerish about you? ALL YOUR ONE THOUSAND POSTS ARE COTDAMN PRO-FLOYD, from who's the best in this era to who's p4p king at the moment to who will win in the Hatton fight to who ducked who and even to very mundane but related topics like whether or not Castillo was shot in the Hatton fight, etcera, etcetara. All of your arguments reek of nuthuggerism, which of course isnt the issue with me, but the fact that you present yourself as an objective poster when in reality you are not.

[THe TRiNiTY]

Well-thought out argument? Are you frigging kidding me? Why do you have to self-congratulate yourself every now-and-then? What an insecure loser you are.

Do I also detect an "I'm-entitled-to-my-opinion-so-back-off" tone from you? So are you saying I can't call you out on your opinion anymore? This has to be the white flag in our discussion, as it seems you dont want part of it anymore.

What is nuthuggerish about you? ALL YOUR ONE THOUSAND POSTS ARE COTDAMN PRO-FLOYD, from who's the best in this era to who's p4p king at the moment to who will win in the Hatton fight to who ducked who and even to very mundane but related topics like whether or not Castillo was shot in the Hatton fight, etcera, etcetara. All of your arguments reek of nuthuggerism, which of course isnt the issue with me, but the fact that you present yourself as an objective poster when in reality you are not.

OKay, I'm not going to debate this with you any longer. I'm not here to be insulting from you, without any rational cause behind it. You can think what you want about me, but it's just annoying when someone doesn't listen to reason.

POINTS: I'm not pro-Floyd. I'm pro-opinion. Call me out on my opinion, all you'd like. But don't act as if I'm ****** because we don't share the same opinion. It's OPINION, not fact. No one is right. Not me, or you. If you want to settle this, like I've said, create a poll, an OPEN poll, and ask people if they think I'm a biased poster. Otherwise, your argument lacks evidence and is really a non-issue at this point.

As far as anything else, I'm tired of trying to prove a valid point to someone who is NEVER going to see my side of the argument unless I agree EXACTLY with him. I SEE your point of view. I don't agree with it on certain things. I still see where you're coming from. I don't have to resort to, "You're a nuthugger" or, "You lack class, and are an idiot, and you're biased." You just think differently than I do. Big deal. If you're not interested in the poll idea, I'd suggest you stop with claims you're not willing to back up. Otherwise, PM me back, please, and you have a nice night.

[joepal]

OKay, I'm not going to debate this with you any longer. I'm not here to be insulting from you, without any rational cause behind it. You can think what you want about me, but it's just annoying when someone doesn't listen to reason.

POINTS: I'm not pro-Floyd. I'm pro-opinion. Call me out on my opinion, all you'd like. But don't act as if I'm ****** because we don't share the same opinion. It's OPINION, not fact. No one is right. Not me, or you. If you want to settle this, like I've said, create a poll, an OPEN poll, and ask people if they think I'm a biased poster. Otherwise, your argument lacks evidence and is really a non-issue at this point.

As far as anything else, I'm tired of trying to prove a valid point to someone who is NEVER going to see my side of the argument unless I agree EXACTLY with him. I SEE your point of view. I don't agree with it on certain things. I still see where you're coming from. I don't have to resort to, "You're a nuthugger" or, "You lack class, and are an idiot, and you're biased." You just think differently than I do. Big deal. If you're not interested in the poll idea, I'd suggest you stop with claims you're not willing to back up. Otherwise, PM me back, please, and you have a nice night.

Three full paragraphs but nothing susbstantial. Which was to be expected coming from this poster who resorts to nothing but equivocations and half-truths.

This poster would have it that THERE WAS NO SUCH THING AS PRO-FLOYD OR PRO-PACQUIAO OR PRO-HOPKINS in here. Right. So there are no Pacquiao fans, or Mayweather fans, or Hoipkins fans. No Mayweather fans? ARE YOU FRIGGING KIDDING ME? What do you think of these threads?

He wants me to make a poll about him. If that ain't an indication of delusion in this guy, I dont know what is.

[THe TRiNiTY]

Three full paragraphs but nothing susbstantial. Which was to be expected coming from this poster who resorts to nothing but equivocations and half-truths.

This poster would have it that THERE WAS NO SUCH THING AS PRO-FLOYD OR PRO-PACQUIAO OR PRO-HOPKINS in here. Right. So there are no Pacquiao fans, or Mayweather fans, or Hoipkins fans. No Mayweather fans? ARE YOU FRIGGING KIDDING ME? What do you think of these threads?

He wants me to make a poll about him. If that ain't an indication of delusion in this guy, I dont know what is.

Then don't make the poll. I'm just not interested in the run-around with this conversation.

[joepal]

Then don't make the poll. I'm just not interested in the run-around with this conversation.

Why should anyone make a poll about you? Do you have any delusions of grandeur? Or flights of fancy?

[THe TRiNiTY]

Why should anyone make a poll about you? Do you have any delusions of grandeur? Or flights of fancy?

No, the ONLY reason I think anyone should, is if they're interested in an unbiased view of the boards thoughts on my objectivity. If you're not interested in that, don't make the poll. I wasn't demanding you to. I have no reason or need to see it done. Wont affect me.

[joepal]

No, the ONLY reason I think anyone should, is if they're interested in an unbiased view of the boards thoughts on my objectivity. If you're not interested in that, don't make the poll. I wasn't demanding you to. I have no reason or need to see it done. Wont affect me.

Oh boy. Somebody has a really frigging high regard of himslef in here.

[THe TRiNiTY]

Oh boy. Somebody has a really frigging high regard of himslef in here.

That's not a comment regarding HOW interesting I am. That's a comment mentioning that if someone WERE interested, they have the right to do such a thing. If you're not, it doesn't hurt my feelings. I was just saying you could, if you cared to settle the argument, in a fair fashion. You chose not to, and you're entitled. Not a problem to me.

[joepal]

That's not a comment regarding HOW interesting I am. That's a comment mentioning that if someone WERE interested, they have the right to do such a thing. If you're not, it doesn't hurt my feelings. I was just saying you could, if you cared to settle the argument, in a fair fashion. You chose not to, and you're entitled. Not a problem to me.

It's not even a fair poll if you ask me. The Floyd nuthuggers are literally crawling in this place. They will most definitely vote for their own. Check the absurdity of their claims in the recent polls regarding Floyd.