They're B class, no doubt
Corrales & Castillo A Class Or B Class
Collapse
-
do you think the punch stats coupled with the outrage of the fans and media of whom the overwhelming majority thought he lost suggest you are wrong in your analysis of the fightI will say this in all honesty:
I prefer a boxing style. So I thought that mayweather won the fight. It was a close fight. Perhaps it is my bias, but I give a close fight to my guy. I HAD PERNELL BEATING oSCAR. BUT I DON'T COMPLAIN ABOUT THE DECISION.
I have NO PROBLEM with anybody who saw PBF/JLC the other way. The key issue for me is that PBF got a disputed decision and rematched him IMMEDIATELY to prove who the better man was.Comment
-
This would be a classic example of how NOT to compare fighters.Bro I'll Answer your question. Obviously you would say that Mayweather is an A fighter so let's break it down a bit between common opposition of Mayweather and Cotto:
Cotto Mayweather
Zab Judah TKO 11 UD 12
Chop Chop Corely TKO 5 UD 12
Victorian Sosa TKO 4 UD 12
Justin Juuko TKO 5 (10th pro fight) KO 9 (21st pro fight)
Not that this should make a difference but it's crazy that this young cat has accomplished what the Pound 4 Pound guy could not. This I would say is an indication of Class A fighter!
Joe Frazier was a great fighter. We all agree fine.
Joe Frazier beat Ali, knocking him down. He further has two other close fights, going a total of 44 rounds.
Joe Frazier was blown out badly - TWICE - by George Foreman, tasting canvas about ten times.
Ken Norton? Rinse and Repeat.
Soooo, Foreman is better than Ali...right? Well, Foreman is at least ON PAR with Ali....right?Comment
-
Comment
-
Punch stats can be very deceptive. If punchstats are to be believed, then Floyd dominated Oscar.
I have NO PROBLEM with anybody who saw the fight casttillo's way. In fact, just to put it to bed, I am always willing to concede that Floyd got a favorable decision. Now, that's behind us. PBF rematched him immediately. And proved decisively who the better man was.
Is that fair?Comment
-
to be honest DIOS i got a difinitive answer already by virtue of the fact you avoided the question for over 2 daysPunch stats can be very deceptive. If punchstats are to be believed, then Floyd dominated Oscar.
I have NO PROBLEM with anybody who saw the fight casttillo's way. In fact, just to put it to bed, I am always willing to concede that Floyd got a favorable decision. Now, that's behind us. PBF rematched him immediately. And proved decisively who the better man was.
Is that fair?Comment
-
"wrong" is always tough to say.
In any split decision, it would mean that one judge (or two) got it "wrong".
Was Kaczmarek "wrong" to score for Oscar over Mayweather? Or were the other two judges "wrong"?Comment
-
No.. I gave you the answer 2 days ago, and I can pull up the post. I said that I thought PBF won every fight since losing to Augie sanchez in the trials. Including that Olympic final and JLC 1.
You may not LIKE my answer. But three judges who were ringside saw it like I did. Unless you believe that those judges were crooked....Comment
-
there you go again it has nothing to wirth the ODLH fight, in this case at least 2 of them got it wrong i could undrstand u making a case if it was only the punch stats that did'nt favour PBF but when the overwhelming majority of people at ringside and the crowd.well basically the majority of boxing fans thought he had lost
which just illustrates how biased you truly are ,Comment
-
all you did DIOS was reword it you did not say YES i thought PBF lost the fight against Castillo ,you reworded it "I said that I thought PBF won every fight since losing to Augie sanchez in the trials" which just leads me to believe in your heart of hearts you know he lost and so do iNo.. I gave you the answer 2 days ago, and I can pull up the post. I said that I thought PBF won every fight since losing to Augie sanchez in the trials. Including that Olympic final and JLC 1.
You may not LIKE my answer. But three judges who were ringside saw it like I did. Unless you believe that those judges were crooked....
which again shows how biased you are how can you converse with somebody who is so blatently biasedComment
Comment