Corrales & Castillo A Class Or B Class

[Vladimir303]

all you did DIOS was reword it you did not say YES i thought PBF lost the fight against Castillo ,you reworded it "I said that I thought PBF won every fight since losing to Augie sanchez in the trials" which just leads me to believe in your heart of hearts you know he lost and so do i

which again shows how biased you are how can you converse with somebody who is so blatently biased

Give it up asswhipe. He doesn't think that Castillo WON.....and you do...end of it.

You're not gonna convince him otherwise. You hate floyd mayweather and the Castillo 1 fight is the only thing you have to lean on because that's the closest somebody came to beating him. Yes it can be debated that Castillo won but the fact that Floyd won wasn't a robbery.

It was a close fight and Mayweater got the decision and he avenged the loss convincingly in the rematch.......period.

[DIOS DOMINICANO]

all you did DIOS was reword it you did not say YES i thought PBF lost the fight against Castillo ,you reworded it "I said that I thought PBF won every fight since losing to Augie sanchez in the trials" which just leads me to believe in your heart of hearts you know he lost and so do i

which again shows how biased you are how can you converse with somebody who is so blatently biased

Lemme get this straight: anybody who saw the fighti differently than you did is biased?

I told you that I thought it was a close fight and I gave Floyd the nod. I have been through this so many times on so many fights. I thought Winky beat taylor. i thought SRL beat hagler. I thought Floyd beat Oscar.

It doesn't pay to argue close fights because I won't change your mind, and you won't change mine. My friends and I have ben arguing Oscar/tito for eight years. That is whay I say that i'm glad that there was an immediate rematch.

Kaczmarek had it 7-5 Oscar, and another judge had it 8-4 Floyd. Such is teh diversity of opinion when Floyd fights.

Pernell won nine rounds (imo) and got a draw vs Chavez, Some people see agreesion, and I'm seeing slipped punches and counter rights.

If you feel castillo won, I COMPLETELY RESPECT THAT. But again, they fought again a 2nd time. Immediately. And there was no dispute.

Is that fair?

[Dynamite Kid]

Give it up asswhipe. He doesn't think that Castillo lost.....and you do...end of it.

You're not gonna convince him otherwise. You hate floyd mayweather and the Castillo 1 fight is the only thing you have to lean on because that's the closest somebody came to beating him. Yes it can be debated that Castillo won but the fact that Floyd won wasn't a robbery.

It was a close fight and Mayweater got the decision and he avenged the loss convincingly in the rematch.......period.

another PBF bandit thats what u are , i dont hate Floyd Mayweather i hate pricks like you who wont heard a bad word said about him even when it is a valid criticism

and then proceed to disrespect other fighters like Hatton and make thread after thread ,you may bot be as bad as DIOS but the fact is you still a pbf nuthugger

[Dynamite Kid]

Lemme get this straight: anybody who saw the fighti differently than you did is biased?

I told you that I thought it was a close fight and I gave Floyd the nod. I have been through this so many times on so many fights. I thought Winky beat taylor. i thought SRL beat hagler. I thought Floyd beat Oscar.

It doesn't pay to argue close fights because I won't change your mind, and you won't change mine. My friends and I have ben arguing Oscar/tito for eight years. That is whay I say that i'm glad that there was an immediate rematch.

Kaczmarek had it 7-5 Oscar, and another judge had it 8-4 Floyd. Such is teh diversity of opinion when Floyd fights.

Pernell won nine rounds (imo) and got a draw vs Chavez, Some people see agreesion, and I'm seeing slipped punches and counter rights.

If you feel castillo won, I COMPLETELY RESPECT THAT. But again, they fought again a 2nd time. Immediately. And there was no dispute.

Is that fair?

i aint got a problem with wether PBF won or lost that fight DIOS but when you have the ordasity to bring up Hatton v Collazo as stick to beat Hatton with you can see why it pisses me off because my friend it is double standards wether you are a fan of Hatton or not do you see wht im getting at

it works both ways understand

[Vladimir303]

i aint got a problem with wether PBF won or lost that fight DIOS but when you have the ordasity to bring up Hatton v Collazo as stick to beat Hatton with you can see why it pisses me off because my friend it is double standards wether you are a fan of Hatton or not do you see wht im getting at

it works both ways understand

WTF did he just say?

[Dynamite Kid]

WTF did he just say?

playing deaf you heard and you know it its right lad ,

[Vladimir303]

playing deaf you heard and you know it its right lad ,

Ok I had trouble since your spelling is bad BUT after reading it again I think I understand. Yes Hatton's gameplan is based off of the Castillo/floyd 1 fight.
Yes Hatton has even watched Duran/leonard 1 and how Duran beat the slick Leonard.

So what?

Fact is, Hatton moved up to 147 and had problems against a feather-fisted Collazo who hurt him in the 12th.

The Combination Collazo landed in the 12th, Floyd can land all night. He has better footworkd then Collazo and will Bust Hatton up like nobody ever has.

The Towel will be throwin in sooner or later and Floyd will be declared the winner by TKO.

Guarateeed

[DIOS DOMINICANO]

i aint got a problem with wether PBF won or lost that fight DIOS but when you have the ordasity to bring up Hatton v Collazo as stick to beat Hatton with you can see why it pisses me off because my friend it is double standards wether you are a fan of Hatton or not do you see wht im getting at

it works both ways understand

Here is how it works.

Everybody says "Look at the first castillo fight. That is the way to beat Floyd". Ricky said it. Oscar said it. many posters on here said it. It is generally accepted as a valid argument. Fine.

That fight was six years ago with Floyd moving up to fight a much bigger man. And Floyd rematched him and beat him soundly.

But if I bring up the fact that hatton gassed late vs Collazo and was almost KO'd, then I'm somehow an ******* for that. And that fight was just ONE year ago.

How does that work?

The "Castillo template" is completely valid, but nobody should ever mention that Hatton looked pretty bad late in both the Collazo and urango fights? Which were much more recent (and therefore, more valid)?

Who has the real double-standard?

[Barlog]

Bro I'll Answer your question. Obviously you would say that Mayweather is an A fighter so let's break it down a bit between common opposition of Mayweather and Cotto:
Cotto Mayweather
Zab Judah TKO 11 UD 12
Chop Chop Corely TKO 5 UD 12
Victorian Sosa TKO 4 UD 12
Justin Juuko TKO 5 (10th pro fight) KO 9 (21st pro fight)

Not that this should make a difference but it's crazy that this young cat has accomplished what the Pound 4 Pound guy could not. This I would say is an indication of Class A fighter!

Those guys fought Mayweather at his unatural weightclass except for Juuko.
Mayweither lost power moving up so its an unfair comparison.


And juuko fought Cotto 2 weight classes above his natural weight.Which means he was fighting a much bigger guy then he was use to.

[Barlog]

all you did DIOS was reword it you did not say YES i thought PBF lost the fight against Castillo ,you reworded it "I said that I thought PBF won every fight since losing to Augie sanchez in the trials" which just leads me to believe in your heart of hearts you know he lost and so do i

which again shows how biased you are how can you converse with somebody who is so blatently biased

Max kellermen and brian kenny also had it for Mayweather,are their bias to.