Mayweather is an oranatment, a dressing

[ßringer]

Capable of making what? Excuses?

yeah right.

Capable of making excuses.

Stick to your excuses.

Meanwhile here's what Chicken Fake Floyd has to say to you his idiot fan.

"I'm not fighting to prove who's the best".

That's because he doesn't have to prove it anymore, he already has. That's why every expert on the sport who makes a living discussing boxing ranks him as the #1 p4p fighter in the world. Pac will always play second fiddle to Floyd, I'm sorry that irks you.

[The Troll]

Floyd's wins are more often than not about what his opponent doesn't do as opposed to what he does to him. It's relative. Winning based on relativtiy is not greatnest it does not deserve the accolades he gets from the media who make him the focus point in boxing.

[Joartcc3]

That's because he doesn't have to prove it anymore, he already has. That's why every expert on the sport who makes a living discussing boxing ranks him as the #1 p4p fighter in the world. Pac will always play second fiddle to Floyd, I'm sorry that irks you.

Doesn't need to? Lols.

Another excuse coming from an idiot like you. Yeah right.

Fake Floyd doesn't need to prove himself anymore.

Freitas, Casamayor, Kostya, Cotto, Margarito, Williams, Mosley.

He doesn't need to prove himself anymore.

yeah right.

[moofo]

sugar ray leonard is one of my favorite fighters of all time! i love his heart, speed, skill, talent, showmanship, power, class, style etc etc. i guess its just my preference. maybe if u sat ringside with me u could tell him your theory on being sweet or sugar to his face since i sat behind him for the fight last sat huh?

Just because you were sat behind him what does that matter?
I'm not questioning the credibility of Sugar Ray here just what you sitting near him has to do with anything?

[Joartcc3]

Floyd's wins are more often than not about what his opponent doesn't do as opposed to what he does to him. It's relative. Winning based on relativtiy is not greatnest it does not deserve the accolades he gets from the media who make him the focus point in boxing.

Exaclty. Pure genius. This is what I've been trying to say and very few people have the wisdom to see it.

It's all about what his opponent doesn't do rather than what he does. And so he wins pathetic fights by running like a chicken, throwing less than 30 punches per round and hugging ala J. Ruiz.

And to think very few people have the wisdom to see beyond this facade. Goodness gracious!

[DIOS DOMINICANO]

I don't see the beauty of running like a chicken from an outclassed Baldomir.
Now I see the beauty of a 3 round destruction of the Great Morales.

it's all common sense really.

Tell ya what. Manny and Floyd are the same size.

Let's have Manny Pacquiao go fight Carlos Baldomir. Let's see how that goes.

[DIOS DOMINICANO]

Floyd's wins are more often than not about what his opponent doesn't do as opposed to what he does to him. It's relative. Winning based on relativtiy is not greatnest it does not deserve the accolades he gets from the media who make him the focus point in boxing.

It seems to hurt you that Floyd has been on the p4p list for almost ten years.

Does that type of professional respect annoy you? Or is it the $20 million paychecks?

[DIOS DOMINICANO]

Exaclty. Pure genius. This is what I've been trying to say and very few people have the wisdom to see it.

It's all about what his opponent doesn't do rather than what he does. And so he wins pathetic fights by running like a chicken, throwing less than 30 punches per round and hugging ala J. Ruiz.

And to think very few people have the wisdom to see beyond this facade. Goodness gracious!

Jo,

Can you please give us an example of a fight where Mayweather threw under 30 punches per round?

Thanks.

[SpeedKillz]

Tell ya what. Manny and Floyd are the same size.

Let's have Manny Pacquiao go fight Carlos Baldomir. Let's see how that goes.

dammit dios you stole the words out my mouth again!!

but yea i was gonna say that too...

[mrrupo]

I can never understand in boxing how a boxer or boxing can be referred to as 'sweet' or preety.' In boxing you bludgen your opponent about his skull and body until he cannot stand up any more. And avoid having this done to yourself because you cannot bludgen your opponent about his skull and body if you yourself are compromised or incapacitated. How anything about that is sweet and pretty I dont know but that is boxing the rest of it is dressing and ornatements.

What is the most convincing way you can win a win a round in a prize fight? Would you disagree with me that it is bludgening your opponents skull and body with an abundance of brutallic powers shots perhaps even even knocking hm down once or twice?

With Mayweather and alot of these 'sweet' 'preety' sugar' guys you dont get that. Mayweather doesn't go into a fight, a round with that intention. He uses ornatements, a relativity he establishes with later day technicalties and politics to gagner descisions and keep his status thanks to his patrons in media.

He rightly deserves the criticism he gets from fans because he doesn't deserve to be the focal point in boxing.

I'm pretty sure he bludgeoned Gatti... I agree with some of your criticism, but just because floyd is not a brawler doesnt mean he isnt great. I would love to see him in some wars, but that's not how he fights, and no one has forced him to fight that way, yet.

Oh, and about sweet - it comes from a quote by a writer or reporter in which he called boxing "the sweet science of bruising". and about "sugar" - sugar ray robinson put bludgeonings on plenty of people. check the history of the guys with these names before making such a blanket statement.