I can never understand in boxing how a boxer or boxing can be referred to as 'sweet' or preety.' In boxing you bludgen your opponent about his skull and body until he cannot stand up any more. And avoid having this done to yourself because you cannot bludgen your opponent about his skull and body if you yourself are compromised or incapacitated. How anything about that is sweet and pretty I dont know but that is boxing the rest of it is dressing and ornatements.
What is the most convincing way you can win a win a round in a prize fight? Would you disagree with me that it is bludgening your opponents skull and body with an abundance of brutallic powers shots perhaps even even knocking hm down once or twice?
With Mayweather and alot of these 'sweet' 'preety' sugar' guys you dont get that. Mayweather doesn't go into a fight, a round with that intention. He uses ornatements, a relativity he establishes with later day technicalties and politics to gagner descisions and keep his status thanks to his patrons in media.
He rightly deserves the criticism he gets from fans because he doesn't deserve to be the focal point in boxing.
What is the most convincing way you can win a win a round in a prize fight? Would you disagree with me that it is bludgening your opponents skull and body with an abundance of brutallic powers shots perhaps even even knocking hm down once or twice?
With Mayweather and alot of these 'sweet' 'preety' sugar' guys you dont get that. Mayweather doesn't go into a fight, a round with that intention. He uses ornatements, a relativity he establishes with later day technicalties and politics to gagner descisions and keep his status thanks to his patrons in media.
He rightly deserves the criticism he gets from fans because he doesn't deserve to be the focal point in boxing.
Comment