Black boxer bias

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • squealpiggy
    Stritctly UG's friend
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jan 2007
    • 28896
    • 2,028
    • 1,603
    • 66,600

    #151
    Originally posted by sonofisis
    Not sure what this implies? Firstly, if you understood the Rwandan conflict, it wasn't "racially motivated" since by definition, Hutu and Tutsi are both Bantu. Europeans imposed some fake "Hamite" classification on the Tutsi, which lead to some jealousy, however, conflict between these peoples were boiling over ever since the pre-colonial kingdom of Rwanda and had nothing to do with "racism".. Hitler on the other hand, was racially motivated.

    Furthermore although the Rwandan conflict has been simplified into a majority Hutu genocide perpetrated against the privileged Tutsi minority, in fact Rwanda had for years been a timebomb of subsistence poverty and dwindling resources. What superficially may have looked like one ethnic group killing another was in fact a civil war in which Hutus killed Hutus, Tutsis killed Tutsis and both sides killed each other. Because the Hutus were a majority it is inevitable that Tutsi casualties outstripped Hutu in a war of attrition.

    More details can be found in Jared Diamond's excellent book, Collapse

    I disagree with you on the motivations of Hitler. Although his behaviour and policies towards the ***s and other ********** were certainly racist, his beliefs were a combination of Nietzschian "superman" philosophy (particularly as it applied to ayrian superiority) and an obsession with restoring Germany to what he considered to be its glory days. To this end Hitler's primary enemies were in fact communists and Bolsheviks, and it was initially his motivation that ***s were allied to these groups that led him to support their persecution. It was only later that he viewed the systematic persecution of ***s as an end in itself. I would suggest that Hitler's primary motivation was political and not racial, not that this excuses him for any of his disgusting and unforgivable actions.

    Comment

    • Ironside
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jul 2007
      • 2478
      • 94
      • 201
      • 8,897

      #152
      Originally posted by toyboy33
      On another note, do you want to go ahead and pay me my 2000 points now or wait until PBF wins. We know the fight is just a detail to get out of the way.
      don't mock me, and it seems you're getting overconfident. That's not always a good thing. If PBF overlooks Hatton like you are, he's in for a rude awakening.

      Comment

      • Ironside
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jul 2007
        • 2478
        • 94
        • 201
        • 8,897

        #153
        let me make it 2to1 odds for you, lets make this interesting.

        Comment

        • sonofisis
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jun 2005
          • 3241
          • 233
          • 78
          • 9,871

          #154
          Originally posted by McKay
          No that was as racially motivated as it gets that **** in Africa. you confuse Nationalism for racism, in fact I dont think you can distinguish the two.
          No, you confuse ethnic conflict with "racism".. This is like saying whenever one nation or tribal entity conquers another that they are racist. Black on Black crime is not racism and Im interested in hearing how a black killing another black is "racially motivated". Almost like the situation in Dafur, where you have Arabized Africans killing Christian and Animist Africans.

          Comment

          • toyboy33
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Apr 2006
            • 1654
            • 54
            • 67
            • 8,689

            #155
            Originally posted by Ironside
            let me make it 2to1 odds for you, lets make this interesting.
            I'll take those odds. Anything else I can help you with today, sir?

            Comment

            • sonofisis
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Jun 2005
              • 3241
              • 233
              • 78
              • 9,871

              #156
              Originally posted by squealpiggy
              Furthermore although the Rwandan conflict has been simplified into a majority Hutu genocide perpetrated against the privileged Tutsi minority, in fact Rwanda had for years been a timebomb of subsistence poverty and dwindling resources. What superficially may have looked like one ethnic group killing another was in fact a civil war in which Hutus killed Hutus, Tutsis killed Tutsis and both sides killed each other. Because the Hutus were a majority it is inevitable that Tutsi casualties outstripped Hutu in a war of attrition.



              More details can be found in Jared Diamond's excellent book, Collapse
              Spot on. Except in addition, like I've emphasized, the conflict also stretches back to pre-colonial times in the actual Kingdom of Rwanda (before the poverty and colonialism). The Tutsi have been the dominant group in the area for a while and a lot of the atrocities consisted of Hutu vengeance from then, and colonial times. Thanx for the link too.

              I disagree with you on the motivations of Hitler. Although his behaviour and policies towards the ***s and other ********** were certainly racist, his beliefs were a combination of Nietzschian "superman" philosophy (particularly as it applied to ayrian superiority) and an obsession with restoring Germany to what he considered to be its glory days. To this end Hitler's primary enemies were in fact communists and Bolsheviks, and it was initially his motivation that ***s were allied to these groups that led him to support their persecution. It was only later that he viewed the systematic persecution of ***s as an end in itself. I would suggest that Hitler's primary motivation was political and not racial, not that this excuses him for any of his disgusting and unforgivable actions.
              You however, side step the fact that Hitler's political agenda was feuled by a belief in racial superiority. "Returning Germany to its Glory days" literally meant cleansing Germany and the world to make way for racial purity. Communism was an affront to this ideology as with communism there are no hierarchical groups, which would lead to a lack of control. It undermines exclusive Aryan domination, so his racial and political beliefs are inextricably linked and cannot be separated.

              Comment

              • toyboy33
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Apr 2006
                • 1654
                • 54
                • 67
                • 8,689

                #157
                Originally posted by sonofisis
                No, you confuse ethnic conflict with "racism".. This is like saying whenever one nation or tribal entity conquers another that they are racist. Black on Black crime is not racism and Im interested in hearing how a black killing another black is "racially motivated". Almost like the situation in Dafur, where you have Arabized Africans killing Christian and Animist Africans.

                I'll give you this. For a argumentative troublemaker, you are quite intelligent.

                Comment

                • Verstyle
                  Future Champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Aug 2005
                  • 33130
                  • 2,466
                  • 3,248
                  • 49,262

                  #158
                  How the hell did I miss a race thread.

                  Comment

                  • sonofisis
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jun 2005
                    • 3241
                    • 233
                    • 78
                    • 9,871

                    #159
                    Originally posted by toyboy33
                    I'll give you this. For a argumentative troublemaker, you are quite intelligent.
                    LOL.. I'm not a trouble maker; just a trouble destroyer. (J/K)..

                    Comment

                    • Verstyle
                      Future Champion
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Aug 2005
                      • 33130
                      • 2,466
                      • 3,248
                      • 49,262

                      #160
                      Originally posted by Ironside
                      Yea because if Kayjay goes into a black neighborhood, they will welcome him with open arms right?
                      Dont overrate how black neighborhoods react to ppl not there race.Because you would be completely wrong. Dont let stereotyping cloud your judgment on ppl,it isnt nice.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP