theres no complete fighters anymore

[niceguy45]

Keep an eye on Jorge Linares

that's right, he still got to prove himself, but already looks good,
but mosley is a complete fighter in my eyes

[MJ406]

Perfect ..... Complete .. how about most well rounded?

I dunno if you can really accuratly use the terms "complete" or perfect to describe a boxer.

because Mosley is more well rounded and complete then Winky Wright, cuz Winky is too defensive and not really a puncher

so how can Mosley lose to a fighter that he is more complete than?

I would use the term well rounded. because upsets happen all the time, and boxers can lose to fighters who may not be as hard a puncher, but can box better and have a better defense.

what do you all think about the term well rounded, to describe boxers?

cuz compete is a pretty "absolute" term.

like everone on here would agree that Lennox Lewis is more complete than Hasim Rahman ... so how the hell could Rahman KO Lewis?

[realheavyhands]

I dunno if you can really accuratly use the terms "complete" or perfect to describe a boxer.

because Mosley is more well rounded and complete then Winky Wright, cuz Winky is too defensive and not really a puncher

so how can Mosley lose to a fighter that he is more complete than?

I would use the term well rounded. because upsets happen all the time, and boxers can lose to fighters who may not be as hard a puncher, but can box better and have a better defense.

what do you all think about the term well rounded, to describe boxers?

cuz compete is a pretty "absolute" term.

like everone on here would agree that Lennox Lewis is more complete than Hasim Rahman ... so how the hell could Rahman KO Lewis?

winky is also naturally alot bigger then shane even when they fought he was at least 10 pounds bigger

[-EX-]

I don't believe in a fighter being perfect. He may have everything but he'll still make mistakes. No robots...

[MJ406]

I don't believe in a fighter being perfect. He may have everything but he'll still make mistakes. No robots...

exactly. you can't use the term perfect. because would a "perfect fighter" lose?

how tall would this "perfect fighter" be? etc

well rounded is a better term, I think at least.

[realheavyhands]

exactly. you can't use the term perfect. because would a "perfect fighter" lose?

how tall would this "perfect fighter" be? etc

well rounded is a better term, I think at least.

thats why i used the term complete

[Amir K Shareef]

i wasnt sayn floyd the best JUST because he undefeated
if he loses to hatton he still will be GOAT
you cant say sugar ray leonard wood beat him
kuz frankly floyd was faster, smarter n had better defense
ppl jus like to hate on floyd an not give him the respect he deserves

[realheavyhands]

i wasnt sayn floyd the best JUST because he undefeated
if he loses to hatton he still will be GOAT
you cant say sugar ray leonard wood beat him
kuz frankly floyd was faster, smarter n had better defense
ppl jus like to hate on floyd an not give him the respect he deserves

hes really not as good as percieved.. he picks all easy fights... we'll see what hatton can do

[Amir K Shareef]

castillo twice?
de la hoya , gatti, judah .. easy??
wat better fights could he have gotten?? at his time besides mosley??
he is just smart that another reason why he one the besst ever

[realheavyhands]

castillo twice?
de la hoya , gatti, judah .. easy??
wat better fights could he have gotten?? at his time besides mosley??
he is just smart that another reason why he one the besst ever

hes a great fighter.. but hes not the best he lacks power and if he keeps fighting sideways hes going to end up with bad legs