Who claimed that Hatton was going to stop Mayweather?
Marsh: "Hatton Lacks The Talent To Beat Floyd"
Collapse
-
Conversely, I'll leave that for you to do for Hatton.
Oh, God forbid you do any work, let alone homework. I wasn't implying that you do work for me, only that you support your unattributed claim, which you have failed to do. "I think" isn't good enough.I'm not going to do your homework for you, plenty have said it. I think it was Larry Merchant who said it on TV.
What fight? How long ago? Is it still "I think' or did he actually say that? Also, what does this have to do with the vast majority believing that Floyd is going to win the fight? You present Larry Merchant as if he alone represents the balance in opinion, even if he did say that. But then again, you only "think" he said it.It was something along the lines of "Of all the fighters out there, Hatton is the one who has the type of physical game that could trouble Mayweather".
No, what I called an overstatement is you saying that the opinion is split on the matter. From my observations, the overwhelming majority has Floyd winning by a long shot, so again, either elucidate what you meant by stating such a thing or refrain from expressing to us your delusions.If you think that the statement 'Ricky might just have the game to trouble Floyd'...not to destroy Floyd, not even necessarily to even defeat him just that he MIGHT have the game to TROUBLE Floyd is an overstatement, then you are an idiot.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Huh?
You asked for a fighter or expert. He's both..........and he clearly stated that on HBO and it was long after the Gatti fight.
Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!Comment
-
But when?! Give some context. I've pointed out that Roy hasn't commented in at least 2 years, so it couldn't have been "long after Gatti". That is a lie, it had to most definitely be before, during, or directly proceeding. After that fight, no one really gave Hatton a chance, which is the point.Comment
-
What are you on about?But when?! Give some context. I've pointed out that Roy hasn't commented in at least 2 years, so it couldn't have been "long after Gatti". That is a lie, it had to most definitely be before, during, or directly proceeding. After that fight, no one really gave Hatton a chance, which is the point.
I pointed to an expert/fighter who clearly stated the answer to what you were asking, and now you want an in depth detailed chronology?
Or what was it you're looking for? Hatton to just retire now because he doesn't stand a chance? Or everyone to unanimously state that Floyd wins easily?
Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!Comment
-
Wow, you're slow and you don't follow sequences very well.What are you on about?
I pointed to an expert/fighter who clearly stated the answer to what you were asking, and now you want an in depth detailed chronology?
Or what was it you're looking for? Hatton to just retire now because he doesn't stand a chance? Or everyone to unanimously state that Floyd wins easily?
#1 I asked you when dd Roy say it because if it was before the Gatti fight, plenty of people gave Hatton a shot.
#2 However, right after Floyd demolished Gatti, people like Merchant were saying things like, "who's gonna fight him now", and Hatton and Cotto indeed were claiming that they weren't ready
#3 Ever since then, Floyd has been beating bigger guys than Hatton and today, everyone seems to feel that Hatton doesn't stand a chance.
#4 So again, what I asked you so politely, was to present to me when Roy said it, since it is relevant to why I am asking. If he said it like a month ago, then that's relevant. If he said it 2 years ago, then it is not.Comment
-
what you think floyds skill or rickys pressure lets discuss the matter
Comment
Comment