Who beat thier common opponents more convincingly/decisively...Cotto or Floyd?
Collapse
-
-
-
If he was in such trouble, Corley would've/should've finished him. No? Cotto gets hit, but his recovery is amazing. Fact is: Floyd went down against Zab and Cotto didnt, regardless of the few solid uppercuts that Zab caught Cotto with.Comment
-
Floyd wasn't hurt when Zab caught him, he was off balance. And this is a ****** thread. Who cares who beat them better(regarding KO's) they were wins. We know Cotto is good and has more power than Floyd. You don't have to make pointless threads to ****ride him.Comment
-
The other was 33-0, a lightweight champ and ranked top 5 p4p.
you make a real good point.
And Floyd beat all these guys first, which matters, but Cotto beat them more convincingly, with the the possible exception of Corley, who he dominated, wasnt put on ***** street like Cotto, and dropped him twice with excellent combinations.gComment
-
Fact is, neither one of them went down, cause no kd's were counted.
moot point.Comment
-
-
Watch the fight and then get a clue.
Floyd got caught with a good shot and stepped back into the ropes and covered up, only to throw a punch 10 seconds later.
Cotto got cracked and was on ***** street for about 1 minute and 15 seconds.
Those two situations should not be grouped in the same sentence.gComment
-
Comment
Comment