Legacies: Roy Jones Vs. Sugar Ray Leonard

[wmute]

No you're an idiot with a 3 years boxrec boxing knowledge. I didn't even answered most of your quotes this time, cause it will be same biased garbage from you.

You've 100 excuses for Jones, you talk out of your ass and say it's fact. Really go back to your boxrec and study a little more.

I dont need boxrec, i watched a lot of boxing, I did a bit of it, too. Boxrec is for checking details, only idiots lke you use it to build their knowledge.

You didnt bother answer because once again, you have no answer.

[GunStar]

lol... bad at math and stubborn. no worries I will teach you

Roy 35 years and 4 months.
Ray 40 years minus 10 months minus some days.

(41-2/12)-(35+4/12) - somedays=
6 -6/12 - somedays =
5 +6 months -somedays < 5 +6 months ----> round to 5

do you get it? or do you need to get back to 3rd grade?

when the KO ratio of Hearns at 175 is low and mediocre at 168, and Tarver is good at 175, you dont need to get in details of what type of KOs it was. Tarver knocked out cold 175ers (and they were not accumulation of punches), Hearns did not.

Once again you got owned and trying to go off topic, I was talking about the time between Norris and Camacho fight, which is 20 days shy of 6 years.

Nice try!

[wmute]

Once again you got owned and trying to go off topic, I was talking about the time between Norris and Camacho fight, which is 20 days shy of 6 years.

Nice try!

I was talking about the age difference between the two all along, i would not be so ****** to argue over the differeence over a 5 or 6 years layoff. That is for ******s, like you.

[wmute]

gotta go back to work. come back to dismantle you later.

[GunStar]

I dont need boxrec, i watched a lot of boxing, I did a bit of it, too. Boxrec is for checking details, only idiots lke you use it to build their knowledge.

You didnt bother answer because once again, you have no answer.

Yes you do, your boxing knowlege is **** and you're proving once again how ****ty it really is.

I answered most of your ******ed repetitive questions, but once again you either go off topic or you repeat the same rubbish again, no point of answering a ****** again.

[GunStar]

gotta go back to work. come back to dismantle you later.

Lol, you must be on crack! Please come back with your repetitive garbage excuses!

[wmute]

Yes you do, your boxing knowlege is **** and you're proving once again how ****ty it really is.

I answered most of your ******ed repetitive questions, but once again you either go off topic or you repeat the same rubbish again, no point of answering a ****** again.

I see that, even with time at your hands, you couldnt come up with any type of logical answer to any point made. I expected that.

I do not rate my knowledge of boxing to be particularly high.

Nonetheless when I argue with you, I must sound like a combination of Hank Kaplan and Socrates.

[GunStar]

I see that, even with time at your hands, you couldnt come up with any type of logical answer to any point made. I expected that.

I do not rate my knowledge of boxing to be particularly high.

Nonetheless when I argue with you, I must sound like a combination of Hank Kaplan and Socrates.

I could careless about a persons boxing knowledge, I know we all have to start at sometime, so even if a person is a boxing n00b, I will respect his opinion, unless he's talking rubbish like you.

What's funny about you is you actually think you've great boxing knowledge with talking out of your ass 9 out of 10 times, last time I checked making ******ed repetitive excuses about your loverboy does not prove your boxing knowledge and being off topic doesn't help either.

Thanks for wasting my time today.

[wmute]

I could careless about a persons boxing knowledge, I know we all have to start at sometime, so even if a person is a boxing n00b, I will respect his opinion, unless he's talking rubbish like you.

What's funny about you is you actually think you've great boxing knowledge with talking out of your ass 9 out of 10 times, last time I checked making ******ed repetitive excuses about your loverboy does not prove your boxing knowledge and being off topic doesn't help either.

Thanks for wasting my time today.

so you are not able to read? I just said i dont rate it high, thing is yours is so ridiculous that in comparison I am like an encyclopedia with Einstein's brain attached to it .

I make points you are not able to answer, you call them "excuses".

You make points I answer, you call it "off topic".

good luck with that...

I have a feeling it's just a matter of time before your posts take the (in)famous shape of "just plain and basic common sense"

[GunStar]

so you are not able to read? I just said i dont rate it high, thing is yours is so ridiculous that in comparison I am like an encyclopedia with Einstein's brain attached to it .

I make points you are not able to answer, you call them "excuses".

You make points I answer, you call it "off topic".

good luck with that...

I have a feeling it's just a matter of time before your posts take the (in)famous shape of "just plain and basic common sense"

Lol, you really are on crack, you actually believe some of the **** you write.

BTW you didn't answer ****, you either came up with a bunch of ******ed repetitive answers or you were off topic.

You remind me of Bozo_no no who never shut-up and believed all the **** he wrote.

I'm going to recommend you what I recommend Bozo 2 years ago, see a shrink before it's too late.