Is that not more than you've seen on Mayweather's rumoured 'offer'?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Since Tsyzu, Why Has Hatton Only Fought the Worst Titleholders?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Miksterious View PostIs that not more than you've seen on Mayweather's rumoured 'offer'?
Nice to see the Hatton fans need to change the subject since there's no denying that Hatton handpicked these weak champions...
Comment
-
Originally posted by $iN View PostIt's become a clear trend for Hatton to face the worst titleholder available whenever he fights a champion. He first chose to fight Maussa, a fighter so terrible that Maussa was beaten by a total journeyman in his very next fight.
Hatton then went up to 147 and chose the weakest beltholder there, Collazo. There were better beltholders like Margarito, Cintron, and Baldomir but Hatton chose the weakest of the 4. This was a good choice in hindsight as Hatton would have probably been knocked out cold by the other three seeing as Hatton couldn't handle light-hitting Collazo's power.
When Collazo sent Hatton back to 140, Hatton once again chose the weakest beltholder in Urango. Urango got a gift decision to win the title in an outright robbery of Ben Rabah and Urango had never beaten a name opponent in his 18-fight career.
Why does Hatton always go after the worst titleholders?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sin City View PostWhy does Mayweather chose to fight the worst title holders??
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Technical_Skill View PostSo is miguel Cotto a joke?
Judah is his best win.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sin City View PostNo Miguel Cotto is not a joke but no one is claiming his the greatest of all time, Judah is Cotto's biggest win.. and Judah got his ass owned.. What does that say about Judah? What does that say about Mayweather?
And to answer your other question, not one, mayweather is a bum.
Now, tell me this, how many mayweather opponents have been in the p4p in their career?
Comment
Comment