Is that not more than you've seen on Mayweather's rumoured 'offer'?
Since Tsyzu, Why Has Hatton Only Fought the Worst Titleholders?
Collapse
-
So you're saying Hatton proposed that the fight be in Vegas? Why are all the reports saying the fight is headed to Vegas in November? Hatton didn't make that offer, right? Wonder who else could have made that offer. Might have to do some deductive reasoning to figure that out...
Nice to see the Hatton fans need to change the subject since there's no denying that Hatton handpicked these weak champions...Comment
-
Why does Mayweather chose to fight the worst title holders??It's become a clear trend for Hatton to face the worst titleholder available whenever he fights a champion. He first chose to fight Maussa, a fighter so terrible that Maussa was beaten by a total journeyman in his very next fight.
Hatton then went up to 147 and chose the weakest beltholder there, Collazo. There were better beltholders like Margarito, Cintron, and Baldomir but Hatton chose the weakest of the 4. This was a good choice in hindsight as Hatton would have probably been knocked out cold by the other three seeing as Hatton couldn't handle light-hitting Collazo's power.
When Collazo sent Hatton back to 140, Hatton once again chose the weakest beltholder in Urango. Urango got a gift decision to win the title in an outright robbery of Ben Rabah and Urango had never beaten a name opponent in his 18-fight career.
Why does Hatton always go after the worst titleholders?Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
It says Cotto fought a Zab judah who already got schooled by floyd mayweather. Cotto fought a guy coming off two losses and a no contest, and i dont see anyone criticizing him, wonder why lol.
And to answer your other question, not one, mayweather is a bum.
Now, tell me this, how many mayweather opponents have been in the p4p in their career?Comment
Comment