Does Jermain Taylor deserve to be off the P4P list?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Super_Lightweight
    Jesus of Nazareth P4P
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jan 2005
    • 7746
    • 452
    • 556
    • 15,482

    #21
    There is absolutely no justification for taking Jermain off and still having Floyd on there.

    None whatsoever.

    Comment

    • niceguy45
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Jan 2007
      • 5035
      • 54
      • 0
      • 11,723

      #22
      right now i thind he does, he has not ducked anyone is undefeated has a clean resume, and does not bull-**** like mayweather and gets paid less and gives a great effort to make it a fight, in eyes right up to this point yes he does need to be up there somewhere

      Comment

      • -EX-
        Trading Block Tycoon
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jan 2006
        • 21258
        • 720
        • 689
        • 32,678

        #23
        Hell no. Jermain definently belongs up there.

        Comment

        • TheEvilSaint
          I Dub Thee UNFORGIVEN
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jun 2005
          • 6713
          • 228
          • 210
          • 13,450

          #24
          his fights with hopkins and winky are history, forgotten already. his last two fights have been such stinkers against smaller fighters, that he lost a lot of credit for the fights he had before.

          honestly, i think taylor is getting too much credit for his credentials. the 1st fight with hopkins was a joke. the 2nd one, taylor didnt really improve. he didnt beat winky, period. so i dont see how he should really get credit for a draw.

          pavlik's inevitable victory over taylor will show that taylor was never anything more than a product who got pushed into the spotlight.

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP