Who was/is Better P4P Champ PBF or RJJ

[IMDAZED]

how genaro hernandez, castillo, ricky hatton(although you wouldn't have known this seeing how you made this post before the hatton fight). to say roy won in more convincing fashion is ******, mayweather is the most dominant fighter of his generation, bar none. which is why at age 34-35, he won't lose, you know why, because not only does he have the fundamentals of a great boxer to avoid punishment like roy did, thus his 2 knockouts against tarver and johnson(which you have to take into account and not give any excuses for, seeing how they would be bull**** excuses anyway, you can't argue a knockout can you?), floyd is a gym rat and trains all year round, and stays in shape, and his mindset is as methodical as any fighter in history, he is too smart a fighter to lose, because he doesn't take anybody lightly, he is too fundamentally tactical to lose, so age won't mean ****, he's still smart as hell.

btw, floyd was way better in his prime than roy, bar none.

Come on man..I love both of these guys but you can't be serious.

First of all, Roy has a better resume. Period. His victory over James Toney trumps any on Floyd's dossier. Furthermore, he won titles from 160 to heavyweight. That trumps everything there as well. Not to mention victories over 19 past or present champs, defending titles 19 times. That's absolutely ridiculous.

Against better opposition, Jones performed better. He went years without losing a round. So yes, he won more convincingly. Why is that statement dumb?

Finally, it's silly to tell us what may or may not happen when Floyd is 34-35. Ray Leonard is arguably better than both and he began losing at 28. What's your point? Yes Jones was KO'ed past his prime...so was Leonard. It is absolutely irrelevant. In fact, how many fighters were still on top at 35? Very few - and those who were accomplished nowhere near as much as Jones did prior to 35. Check your bias at the door.

Finally, whether Floyd is a gym rat or not is also irrelevant. It's what he does in the ring that counts.

[THE REED]

Floyd has never shown up to a fight to just survive...see Tarver/Jones III

This PROVES your an idiot...

your not even comparing prime for prime anymore... lets see what floyd does when hes 36/37 yrs old

[THE REED]

Floyd has never shown up to a fight to just survive...see Tarver/Jones III

Come on man..I love both of these guys but you can't be serious.

First of all, Roy has a better resume. Period. His victory over James Toney trumps any on Floyd's dossier. Furthermore, he won titles from 160 to heavyweight. That trumps everything there as well. Not to mention victories over 19 past or present champs, defending titles 19 times. That's absolutely ridiculous.

Against better opposition, Jones performed better. He went years without losing a round. So yes, he won more convincingly. Why is that statement dumb?

Finally, it's silly to tell us what may or may not happen when Floyd is 34-35. Ray Leonard is arguably better than both and he began losing at 28. What's your point? Yes Jones was KO'ed past his prime...so was Leonard. It is absolutely irrelevant. In fact, how many fighters were still on top at 35? Very few - and those who were accomplished nowhere near as much as Jones did prior to 35. Check your bias at the door.

Finally, whether Floyd is a gym rat or not is also irrelevant. It's what he does in the ring that counts.

Holy god damn imdazed


OWN of the day... jesus.

[Live Dog]

Come on man..I love both of these guys but you can't be serious.

First of all, Roy has a better resume. Period. His victory over James Toney trumps any on Floyd's dossier. Furthermore, he won titles from 160 to heavyweight. That trumps everything there as well. Not to mention victories over 19 past or present champs, defending titles 19 times. That's absolutely ridiculous.

Against better opposition, Jones performed better. He went years without losing a round. So yes, he won more convincingly. Why is that statement dumb?

Finally, it's silly to tell us what may or may not happen when Floyd is 34-35. Ray Leonard is arguably better than both and he began losing at 28. What's your point? Yes Jones was KO'ed past his prime...so was Leonard. It is absolutely irrelevant. In fact, how many fighters were still on top at 35? Very few - and those who were accomplished nowhere near as much as Jones did prior to 35. Check your bias at the door.

Finally, whether Floyd is a gym rat or not is also irrelevant. It's what he does in the ring that counts.

Roy's resume is crap. Toney is the only elite fighter.

Unless I'm mistaken I don't think Roy ever won the cruiser title so no he did not win titles from 160 to HW.

John Ruiz, that was Roy trying to pull the wool over boxing fans eyes. Roy may have been the HW champ, but he went through Ruiz to get it, and that is not saying much.

[Live Dog]

This PROVES your an idiot...

your not even comparing prime for prime anymore... lets see what floyd does when hes 36/37 yrs old

Well since he never fought Tarver in his prime........

[Live Dog]

Roy is Tommy Hearns with more speed and less power.

[Silencers]

Roy Jones.....

[THE REED]

Roy is Tommy Hearns with more speed and less power.

roy has less power than tommy hearns?


aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahahahahahahahah

self

[Live Dog]

roy has less power than tommy hearns?


aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahahahahahahahah

self

If you really think that P4P Roy had more power than Tommy than you are even more biased than I thought.

[THE REED]

If you really think that P4P Roy had more power than Tommy than you are even more biased than I thought.

tommy hearns did not have more power than roy.........

make a poll and you shall be owned by the forum