Calzaghe accepts offer to fight Kessler

[Randall_Hopkirk]

Stay tight, the ambulance will arrive soon, i hope they can stich up your vagina and stop the bleeding.

Some of the stuff I hear on this forum is so random, yet hilarious at the same time.

[.Mik.]

Yes, you should have, most of what you say concerns the same two fighters and most of it is speculation, maybe leave a disclaimer in your sig, something like this

"My posts are influenced by nationalism and i dont ever use any technical evidence in when picking a fight, they mostly contain arsey snping, and big words, im such a big man, i check every post to make sure my spelling is correct, to make up for the fact i have the charisma levels of a ***** cell mixed with a glass of babysham, its fizzy but leaves a nasty aftertaste -Miksterious "

That should do.

I apologize that I dont cater to the slowest minds. But I think its fairly pertinent to assume that if I said 'it seems to me', that I am admitting that it is simply my opinion.

In the case of Calzaghe vs Kessler, my opinion is based on the fact that Calzaghe has beaten better quality of opposition and Kessler is fairly unproven. Whats more, I think that Kessler has a jab one-two style that Calzaghe will not find difficult to counter and out-match. I dont think that Kessler will be capable of out-working Calzaghe and as such he'll be eating sloppy combinations all night long. He hasnt faced anyone with similar levels of power to Calzaghe and his propensity to eat shots (as demonstrated in his previous fight) suggests that if he continues to do so, it wont go to points. Calzaghe on the other hand has shown throughout his career that he can handle some very hard shots.

Thats my point they are great fighters, u still think calzaghe is a 'truly great fighter' if you think taylor's 'running' from him?

My point is that if Calzaghe beats Kessler (thus unifying, clearing out his division, defeating his second 'highly rated punching machine', thus defending his title for a record number of times with one of the longest title-reigns in boxing history) and then beats Hopkins/Wright and Taylor (two or even three fighters high up the P4P list) and then retires undefeated, then yes...he deserves to be considered a truly great fighter.

What is so difficult to understand about this? Its not nationalism, its just common sense.

[Super Cartel]

RE: I'd pay to see Micha Barton get run over.......
by Miksterious 18:35, 06 November 2006
Report
Tremendous. I look forward to stalking her. ... Read More
Miksterious

So your a stalking to?

[Technical_Skill]

I apologize that I dont cater to the slowest minds. But I think its fairly pertinent to assume that if I said 'it seems to me', that I am admitting that it is simply my opinion.

In the case of Calzaghe vs Kessler, my opinion is based on the fact that Calzaghe has beaten better quality of opposition and Kessler is fairly unproven. Whats more, I think that Kessler has a jab one-two style that Calzaghe will not find difficult to counter and out-match. I dont think that Kessler will be capable of out-working Calzaghe and as such he'll be eating sloppy combinations all night long. He hasnt faced anyone with similar levels of power to Calzaghe and his propensity to eat shots (as demonstrated in his previous fight) suggests that if he continues to do so, it wont go to points. Calzaghe on the other hand has shown throughout his career that he can handle some very hard shots.




My point is that if Calzaghe beats Kessler (thus unifying, clearing out his division, defeating his second 'highly rated punching machine', thus defending his title for a record number of times with one of the longest title-reigns in boxing history) and then beats Hopkins/Wright and Taylor (two or even three fighters high up the P4P list) and then retires undefeated, then yes...he deserves to be considered a truly great fighter.

What is so difficult to understand about this? Its not nationalism, its just common sense.

Mik, im gonna read this, but i wanna say something, what happened to you?

Dont believe the hype, you know what i mean, i think someone read a little thread about themselves the other day and has taken themselves very seriously.

One min your mr logical, next mintute your trying to be a 'flamer'

And about your intellegence, i really dont think your uber-intellegent, or even close, you just use a couple of big words and form sentances which have very little to do with boxing,

Like when i 1st came here and you told me Joe Calzaghe is better now, than James Toney was then, that was the time when toney was pound 4 pound number one, lol.

So think about that, cos i can go back and forth with you all day, this aint an act or some internet personality.

So read that, then im gonna answer your above post, need to do summin 1st.

[.Mik.]

Are you trying to suggest that I'm a stalker by...attempting to stalk me?

Oh dear, someone takes internet message board arguments a tad seriously.

[Super Cartel]

So think about that, cos i can go back and forth with you all day, this aint an act or some internet personality.

So read that, then im gonna answer your above post, need to do summin 1st.

Give him time Bra...
50 pence more in the meter for him,if they have meters lol

[Super Cartel]

Are you trying to suggest that I'm a stalker by...attempting to stalk me?

Oh dear, someone takes internet message board arguments a tad seriously.

It isnt that m8..
Out of interest i put your name in Google and it was the Website i found you on that was shocking!

Im a secret Crossdresser.com

U should be ashamed...
This aint an argument either...
Im having fun

[.Mik.]

Mik, im gonna read this, but i wanna say something, what happened to you?

Dont believe the hype, you know what i mean, i think someone read a little thread about themselves the other day and has taken themselves very seriously.

One min your mr logical, next mintute your trying to be a 'flamer'

And about your intellegence, i really dont think your uber-intellegent, or even close, you just use a couple of big words and form sentances which have very little to do with boxing,

Like when i 1st came here and you told me Joe Calzaghe is better now, than James Toney was then, that was the time when toney was pound 4 pound number one, lol.

So think about that, cos i can go back and forth with you all day, this aint an act or some internet personality.

So read that, then im gonna answer your above post, need to do summin 1st.

I'm not aware of any threads about me, nor do I care about any.

I am simply responding very directly to what you post.

I really wouldnt consider yourself to be in any position to claim someone is attempting to 'flame' you, based on the fact that the poster you're in cahoots with in this thread isnt even making the vaguest attempts to discuss the subject matter.

I am in no way claiming to be uber-intelligent. I dont like writing in slang or in 'text speak' or 'net speak'. Its a bad habit to get into. I am a writer, you'll have to excuse me for having a good vocabulary, I never realised that it was something to be criticised over.

Furthermore...I never claimed that my boxing knowledge was fantastic. Hence why I generally stick to arguments of a sensible nature, rather than ones involving deep-rooted boxing history or specific subject knowledge. It is common sense to say that Calzaghe finishing his career by defeating two of the best P4P fighters of the millenium so far would make it a fair call to consider him a 'truly great fighter'.

Now, I know that you will go round and round about this all day. Despite the fact that I've stated quite clearly that its my opinion (something that you seemingly dont like anyone but yourself having) and have backed it up with inarguable logic. Same as I know that your pal will go round and round all day making the same lame gags about Sunderland being a 'backwards' city, probably making base-line japes about my family and most likely trying to dig up some dirt on me, to what end and purpose I have no idea (something which I have always avoided in any debate I've ever had on any forum ever).

Personally, I'll happily stick with how I have always acted around here since I registered. Again, thanks for the advice though, maybe you ought to look a bit closer to home as your behaviour on these forums as the imperious boxing expert whose opinions can not be debated and protector of the unpopular members of the board.

[Super Cartel]

hehehe

Im just havin fun man lol

It was all in jest..
Technical_Skill as nothing to do with it,He is coming at you with a proper
argument while im simply just messing around...

No hard feelings m8....

[Technical_Skill]

I'm not aware of any threads about me, nor do I care about any.

I am simply responding very directly to what you post.

I really wouldnt consider yourself to be in any position to claim someone is attempting to 'flame' you, based on the fact that the poster you're in cahoots with in this thread isnt even making the vaguest attempts to discuss the subject matter.

No, see, im not in cahoots with anyone, so save the paranoia and store it for a rainy day, you quote me 1st and you knew something would come back your way so i dont see what the tears are for.

I am in no way claiming to be uber-intelligent. I dont like writing in slang or in 'text speak' or 'net speak'. Its a bad habit to get into. I am a writer, you'll have to excuse me for having a good vocabulary, I never realised that it was something to be criticised over.

You love yourself tho, cos i got quotes of you saying how intellegent you are and so forth, dont deny it, your opinion, your welcome to it.

Furthermore...I never claimed that my boxing knowledge was fantastic.

Glad to read that.

Hence why I generally stick to arguments of a sensible nature, rather than ones involving deep-rooted boxing history or specific subject knowledge. It is common sense to say that Calzaghe finishing his career by defeating two of the best P4P fighters of the millenium so far would make it a fair call to consider him a 'truly great fighter'.

Two of the best p4p fighters of the Millenium, sorry who are these pound 4 pound fighters your talking about?


And you said if you thought taylor was running from Calzaghe, that makes Calzaghe a 'truly great fighter' no?

Or do i need to go back and re-quote you?


Millenium? lol, its only been 7 years, 2000-2007 although your tried to word it to make it look like its been the full 2,000 lmao.

Now, I know that you will go round and round about this all day. Despite the fact that I've stated quite clearly that its my opinion (something that you seemingly dont like anyone but yourself having) and have backed it up with inarguable logic. Same as I know that your pal will go round and round all day making the same lame gags about Sunderland being a 'backwards' city, probably making base-line japes about my family and most likely trying to dig up some dirt on me, to what end and purpose I have no idea (something which I have always avoided in any debate I've ever had on any forum ever).

Yes Mik, its all a conspiracy, we are all trying to dig up dirt on you, lol, do you think that highly of yourself?

Ive got nothing against you, a couple of days ago you said you were leaving a thread, 5 mins later i see you coming back in the lounge and making comments about me, you knew what would happen, and it happened, no conspiracy mik.

You DO take this seriously, or you wouldnt be throwing allegations around that myself and someone else are 'trying to dig up dirt on you'

Im trying to be nice to you cos i think you a good guy, i never held a grudge against you, ive given ya good k and i nearly always reply to your posts, so i dont see what your problem is.

I dont think i have comminucated once with anyone but you in this thread, i dont do ganging up, you know it, so handle your business.

Personally, I'll happily stick with how I have always acted around here since I registered. Again, thanks for the advice though, maybe you ought to look a bit closer to home as your behaviour on these forums as the imperious boxing expert whose opinions can not be debated and protector of the unpopular members of the board.

Sorry, you got me wrong again, il debate my opinions with anyone, and i will not condone the behaviour of several posters on here towards another poster, thats all i can say.

Now if you cant live with this, feel free to ignore me, i hope you dont tho, hopefully we can get this thread back on track.