Am alone in thinking PACQUIOA should be 4 P4P now???

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • PROUD MEXICAN
    Banned
    Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
    • Apr 2007
    • 63
    • 8
    • 0
    • 102

    #101
    PAC's detractors simply have a weak argument, they're basically saying "PAC is damned if he loses, and PAC is damned if he wins " If PAC loses its because he wasn't that good anyway, and if PAC wins its because he caught them on a bad night. The reason can and will never be because PAC was simply better than all of them. The reason why y'all are using this type of argument is because y'all wanna play it safe, instead of being a man about it.
    Last edited by PROUD MEXICAN; 04-27-2007, 11:48 PM.

    Comment

    • Joartcc3
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Apr 2007
      • 1010
      • 79
      • 0
      • 1,233

      #102
      Originally posted by PROUD MEXICAN
      PAC's detractors simply have a weak argument, they're basically saying "PAC is damned if he loses, and PAC is damned if he wins " If PAC loses its because he wasn't that good anyway, and if PAC wins its because he caught them on a bad night. The reason can and will never be because PAC was simply better than all of them. The reason why y'all are using this type of argument is because y'all wanna play it safe, instead of being a man about it.
      Yeah. My good man.

      It's is admirable that the Mexicans were the staunchest critics of PAC when he started, and now they are also one of his greatest admirers.

      It's because unlike some idiots. Mexicans know their boxing. And yeah, these idiots on this forum have time and time again eaten crow. And I mean A LOT of crow.

      Before PAC's time is over, he will be considered an all-time p4p great. Even the great Ali when he saw PAC fight has compared himself to PAC.

      What an honor! None has been given a bigger accolade to be praised by ALi and compared to himself.

      These PBF fans are just delirious. I really don't understand what they see on that guy. He's a chicken, a coward, I don't mind the trashtalk, but he's a duck, he picks his opponents, has fought sub-par competition over the years.

      And get boos by his own fans.

      Comment

      • Joartcc3
        Banned
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Apr 2007
        • 1010
        • 79
        • 0
        • 1,233

        #103
        Originally posted by Mayweather90
        If Winky beats Hopkins I'd put him Number 2. If Winky does not Pacquiao remains #2. Which would bump Pacquiao to number 1 for me if Floyd steps away.
        Err... A coward and a duck for a p4p king? Anyone?

        Comment

        • Kball15
          HATTON WRIGHT PAVLIK
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Apr 2006
          • 15471
          • 491
          • 86
          • 22,680

          #104
          Originally posted by PROUD MEXICAN
          PAC's detractors simply have a weak argument, they're basically saying "PAC is damned if he loses, and PAC is damned if he wins " If PAC loses its because he wasn't that good anyway, and if PAC wins its because he caught them on a bad night. The reason can and will never be because PAC was simply better than all of them. The reason why y'all are using this type of argument is because y'all wanna play it safe, instead of being a man about it.
          thats not true at all.

          There is a good reason to talk down on him right now.

          Morales is washed up. And he struggled with a guy he should have handled more easily.

          IF he were to fight Marquez again, and really beat him, nobody would or COULD say anything bad about Pacquioa.

          Or if Pacquiao beats Barrera or Soto... Nothing can be said but good things.

          IMO though, Marquez beats Pacquiao pretty badly if they fight again.

          Comment

          • Joartcc3
            Banned
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Apr 2007
            • 1010
            • 79
            • 0
            • 1,233

            #105
            Originally posted by Kball15
            thats not true at all.

            There is a good reason to talk down on him right now.

            Morales is washed up. And he struggled with a guy he should have handled more easily.

            IF he were to fight Marquez again, and really beat him, nobody would or COULD say anything bad about Pacquioa.

            Or if Pacquiao beats Barrera or Soto... Nothing can be said but good things.

            IMO though, Marquez beats Pacquiao pretty badly if they fight again.
            You're probably one of those guys who ate crow. Don't worry, you're not the only one.

            PAC is the p4p king. Take that in your head.

            If you still cling to the idea that PBF is the p4p king, well I don't blame you. If you have a p4p a coward and a duck, then its your choice.

            Comment

            • Bonsi
              aka Turbo rat
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • Jan 2005
              • 604
              • 56
              • 71
              • 7,180

              #106
              Originally posted by Kball15
              barrera and his brother?

              You know we're talking about boxing... right?
              Yes, Marco and his brother cried like diapered sissies after the stoppage by Pac. Marco and his bro cried and begged Pac and the ref to stop the savage beating. then they hug and cried like babies. JMM on the other hand got KD by MAB. and a NO MAS from Morales is priceless, supreme ownage.

              Comment

              • wmute
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Nov 2003
                • 8084
                • 289
                • 446
                • 15,158

                #107
                Originally posted by Joartcc3
                Err... A coward and a duck for a p4p king? Anyone?
                everyone who knows boxing.

                so your p4p king has to be someone who gets repeatedly hit in the face?

                pac is the p4p king of entertainment, a prestigious title previously owned by 2-division world champion Arturo "Thunder" Gatti (Obviously Pac is a much better fighter than gatti, but in your (absence of) logic, that should not matter, right?)

                In the meantime an entire country (85 Million people) + another small batch of delusional fans try as hard as they can to believe their national hero is the best fighter in the world.

                This in spite of Draws, KO losses (dehydration... blah blah... whatever), recent losses (to Morales, a fighter who could beat only 1 man in the past three years: pacman).

                On the other hand you have a fighter who is undefeated, who touched the canvas only with his gloves, who has beaten the man in three divisions (cleaned up one), and who rarely loses rounds.

                Barrera, Morales, Marquez are great names on a fighters' record... if you beat them in their primes. This can be said only about Barrera.

                Comment

                • Joartcc3
                  Banned
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Apr 2007
                  • 1010
                  • 79
                  • 0
                  • 1,233

                  #108
                  Originally posted by wmute
                  everyone who knows boxing.

                  so your p4p king has to be someone who gets repeatedly hit in the face?

                  pac is the p4p king of entertainment, a prestigious title previously owned by 2-division world champion Arturo "Thunder" Gatti (Obviously Pac is a much better fighter than gatti, but in your (absence of) logic, that should not matter, right?)

                  In the meantime an entire country (85 Million people) + another small batch of delusional fans try as hard as they can to believe their national hero is the best fighter in the world.

                  This in spite of Draws, KO losses (dehydration... blah blah... whatever), recent losses (to Morales, a fighter who could beat only 1 man in the past three years: pacman).

                  On the other hand you have a fighter who is undefeated, who touched the canvas only with his gloves, who has beaten the man in three divisions (cleaned up one), and who rarely loses rounds.

                  Barrera, Morales, Marquez are great names on a fighters' record... if you beat them in their primes. This can be said only about Barrera.
                  So you got a coward and a duck for a p4p?

                  Well, it's your choice. I really can't convince you if you prefer a coward and a duck. It's your choice.

                  And shut your mouth about this prime ****. People were talking down on PAC on how he would be beat and yet you genius guys ate crow. So don't be bitter if in the past PAC has made you eat crow so bad that you would rather choose a coward and a duck for a p4p king rather than a true all-time great.

                  Comment

                  • Kball15
                    HATTON WRIGHT PAVLIK
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Apr 2006
                    • 15471
                    • 491
                    • 86
                    • 22,680

                    #109
                    Originally posted by Joartcc3
                    So you got a coward and a duck for a p4p?

                    Well, it's your choice. I really can't convince you if you prefer a coward and a duck. It's your choice.

                    And shut your mouth about this prime ****. People were talking down on PAC on how he would be beat and yet you genius guys ate crow. So don't be bitter if in the past PAC has made you eat crow so bad that you would rather choose a coward and a duck for a p4p king rather than a true all-time great.
                    u really have no idea what ur talking about.

                    All talk of PACMAN being P4P #1 ended when he lost rounds to SOLIS and it took him 8 rounds to win.

                    He's still up there, but there is no question in my mind that both MAYWEATHER and R. MARQUEZ are better fighters.

                    The only reason i could see PACMAN above JMM is because Pacman beat him a while ago. And that kind of plays as the tie breaker, cause they are real close

                    Comment

                    • Joartcc3
                      Banned
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Apr 2007
                      • 1010
                      • 79
                      • 0
                      • 1,233

                      #110
                      Originally posted by Kball15
                      u really have no idea what ur talking about.

                      All talk of PACMAN being P4P #1 ended when he lost rounds to SOLIS and it took him 8 rounds to win.

                      He's still up there, but there is no question in my mind that both MAYWEATHER and R. MARQUEZ are better fighters.

                      The only reason i could see PACMAN above JMM is because Pacman beat him a while ago. And that kind of plays as the tie breaker, cause they are real close
                      HA? Are you serious. PLease read your arguments again. I dont even have to answer this.

                      In the future please make more pertinent arguments please.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP