W.K Vs. Brewster: Nothing to win everything to loose

**kayjay** · 04-24-2007, 03:51 PM

People might question the value of the victory, but it's avenging a loss, and no matter what anyone says Brewster is still tough.

**beez721** · 04-24-2007, 04:10 PM

Originally posted by small_warrior

i feel wlad got nothing to win in this fight. For my part i think wlad in stepping up against a very dangerous opponenrt in lamon brewster. even if he was inactif, it doesn't matter, brewster was never a skilled fighter so he won't have much reflexes or skills to loose. He will have the same heart and power to win the fight. But many people on this site are feeling that brewster will be an easy fight, i think it's one of the most dangerous fight, and if he wins he will get not much credit, because brewster come off a loss an an injury. The klitschko dream to become both champions, is in danger to.

what do yout think

exactly. brewster will always have what has made him dangerous and exciting to watch. heart and power. yes,,,there's much more for brewster to gain and a hell of a lot for wlad to lose

**Steelhammer86** · 04-24-2007, 06:30 PM

I agree this is a very dangerous fight for Wlad. Brewster, Purrity and Sanders are rather similar: lots of heart, good chin, powerful punchers, but without great skills. That's the only type of boxer that can beat Wlad - the skill boxers like Byrd and Brock who try to outbox him always seem to lose. Because Sanders and Purrity are past their prime, the only boxers who might defeat Wlad are his brother Vitali or Brewster, and possibly Peter or Povetkin.

Wlad is courageous to take this fight - he would have an easier time with a technically better fighter like Lyakhovich. Brewster should be well rested, and he's still in his prime at 33. One year off doesn't seem to hurt most boxers, it may help to heal unseen internal injuries from hundreds of punches over the years. Having had a year off didn't hurt Lyakhovich in his fight with Brewster.

Brewster has nothing to lose and everything to gain - he'll be in great shape and give it everything he's got.

**77Ritchie77** · 04-24-2007, 06:36 PM

come on man im as high on povetkin as anyone and think he may one day be as good or better than wlad. but think about this.
watch one of wlads old fights, against some1 like david bostice and look at how sloppy he was. not because he isnt good but becasue he was young and hadn't honed his skills yet. either has povetkin. Although wlad was young and beating ranked fighters just like povetkin, he cant compete with the champ just like wlad wasnt ready for lewis

**Steelhammer86** · 04-24-2007, 07:07 PM

I know what your saying 77Richie77, but Povetkin is already age 27 and he's had a lot of amateur experience at the highest level (arguably the best amateur record of all time at Super Heavyweight: 11 gold medals and one silver in 12 international tournaments). I think he's only three or four fights away from being ready to challenge for a title.

**Hitman932** · 04-24-2007, 07:30 PM

fighting brewster now is the smart thing for wlad career-wise.. he needs to avenge this defeat sooner or later but being that his goal is unification he should really do this right now... otherwise after he has unified the titles a match against brewster would be a burden and might possibly get him stripped

**Steelhammer86** · 04-24-2007, 07:45 PM

Originally posted by Hitman932

fighting brewster now is the smart thing for wlad career-wise.. he needs to avenge this defeat sooner or later but being that his goal is unification he should really do this right now... otherwise after he has unified the titles a match against brewster would be a burden and might possibly get him stripped

True. It's a dangerous fight, but it's something Wlad needs to do, and this is the best time, when there's no unification fight available for a few more months.

**Zn1** · 04-24-2007, 07:55 PM

I think that this is incredibly courageous and im not sure its
a fight he truly wants. he got hurt against samuel peter &
of course already has a ko loss against brewster, albiet a bit
controversially. this could be golota - brewster all over again
and im sure wlad has considered this possibility many times.

yes wlad is better, yes wlad should win, but he may just get
koed anyway. round 3 ko for brewster is my pick but if wlad
koes him early i wont be too surprised, he did beat up lamon
early in their first fight.

**Welter_Skelter** · 04-24-2007, 07:56 PM

Originally posted by small_warrior;2307939[B

]i feel wlad got nothing to win in this fight.[/B] For my part i think wlad in stepping up against a very dangerous opponenrt in lamon brewster. even if he was inactif, it doesn't matter, brewster was never a skilled fighter so he won't have much reflexes or skills to loose. He will have the same heart and power to win the fight. But many people on this site are feeling that brewster will be an easy fight, i think it's one of the most dangerous fight, and if he wins he will get not much credit, because brewster come off a loss an an injury. The klitschko dream to become both champions, is in danger to.

what do yout think

I think Wlad has everything to gain from this fight... His reputation is at stake.. and revenge is a good factor as is Redemption..

You are correct that Brewster is dangerous.. And Wlad has a very good chance of being KO'd BUT he was dominating the 1st fight.. and is a Much more composed paitent and improved boxer.. While Brewster simply is what he is... If Wlad keeps his head like he did in the Sam Peter fight.. I think all Brewster really has is a Punchers chance..

W.K Vs. Brewster: Nothing to win everything to loose