Hatton is Not a P4P Level Figher
Collapse
-
PBF ran???......please explain. PBF to me put his skills to use, it is not like the ring is the size of a football feild, it is not his fault either that baldo could not hit him, it is not his fault that he used the ring size with his skills to beat Baldo. that fight in years to come when analyzed properly will highlight the the skill level in which PBF used to beat the undisputed champion at 147. Words like "ran" is just crude attempts to take away the level at which he operated that night.Comment
-
There's a reason why I put the "......" marks there.PBF ran???......please explain. PBF to me put his skills to use, it is not like the ring is the size of a football feild, it is not his fault either that baldo could not hit him, it is not his fault that he used the ring size with his skills to beat Baldo. that fight in years to come when analyzed properly will highlight the the skill level in which PBF used to beat the undisputed champion at 147. Words like "ran" is just crude attempts to take away the level at which he operated that night.Comment
-
Comment
-
PBF did what he had to do to win effectively. So did Hatton. If you've seen his career beyond the last couple of fights, you'll realise that he is not as much of a clincher as people make out. Both are spoiling tactics in order to frustrate their opponents and both are not what the fans want to see. Why is one okay and the other isnt?PBF ran???......please explain. PBF to me put his skills to use, it is not like the ring is the size of a football feild, it is not his fault either that baldo could not hit him, it is not his fault that he used the ring size with his skills to beat Baldo. that fight in years to come when analyzed properly will highlight the the skill level in which PBF used to beat the undisputed champion at 147. Words like "ran" is just crude attempts to take away the level at which he operated that night.
I'm sorry, but your post is barely comprehensible.Comment
-
One is legal and the other is not.PBF did what he had to do to win effectively. So did Hatton. If you've seen his career beyond the last couple of fights, you'll realise that he is not as much of a clincher as people make out. Both are spoiling tactics in order to frustrate their opponents and both are not what the fans want to see. Why is one okay and the other isnt?
The problem with Hatton's style is that it's become a pattern in his last few fights. Not that it makes him less of a fighter in terms of his ranking or anything like that, it's just painful to watch.Comment
-
If ur post was aimed at me, i have never critised hatton's performance, i dont play the double standard shytPBF did what he had to do to win effectively. So did Hatton. If you've seen his career beyond the last couple of fights, you'll realise that he is not as much of a clincher as people make out. Both are spoiling tactics in order to frustrate their opponents and both are not what the fans want to see. Why is one okay and the other isnt?
I'm sorry, but your post is barely comprehensible.Comment
-
I was using your post to address the opinions of many of the morons who post on here. The 'Hugman Hatton' and 'Hatton would get knocked out by any decent fighter, he's got no skills, all he can do is hug' crowd.Comment
-
If he hasnt a defense why is he not losing? He must have the greatest chin in the world or something or do you mean he has amazing reflexes and relies on his reflexes to avoid getting hit?
By elite do you mean someone like Cotto and PBF and Margarito and Witter?.Comment
Comment