Hatton is Not a P4P Level Figher

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Hydro
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Apr 2006
    • 1673
    • 81
    • 16
    • 8,227

    #91
    Originally posted by hugh grant
    Yeah and if PBF thought in England the ref wouldnt allow PBF to run so much and would want more action from PBF because the ref understands the crowd pay good money to watch and maybe that is why PBF stays and is successful in America?
    The Baldomir fight was the first one in awhile where Mayweather really "ran".

    Comment

    • global_analyst
      Up and Comer
      • Jan 2007
      • 54
      • 3
      • 0
      • 6,078

      #92
      Originally posted by Hydro
      The Baldomir fight was the first one in awhile where Mayweather really "ran".
      PBF ran???......please explain. PBF to me put his skills to use, it is not like the ring is the size of a football feild, it is not his fault either that baldo could not hit him, it is not his fault that he used the ring size with his skills to beat Baldo. that fight in years to come when analyzed properly will highlight the the skill level in which PBF used to beat the undisputed champion at 147. Words like "ran" is just crude attempts to take away the level at which he operated that night.

      Comment

      • Hydro
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Apr 2006
        • 1673
        • 81
        • 16
        • 8,227

        #93
        Originally posted by global_analyst
        PBF ran???......please explain. PBF to me put his skills to use, it is not like the ring is the size of a football feild, it is not his fault either that baldo could not hit him, it is not his fault that he used the ring size with his skills to beat Baldo. that fight in years to come when analyzed properly will highlight the the skill level in which PBF used to beat the undisputed champion at 147. Words like "ran" is just crude attempts to take away the level at which he operated that night.
        There's a reason why I put the "......" marks there.

        Comment

        • global_analyst
          Up and Comer
          • Jan 2007
          • 54
          • 3
          • 0
          • 6,078

          #94
          Originally posted by Hydro
          There's a reason why I put the "......" marks there.
          Okay......sorry my bad

          Comment

          • .Mik.
            I'm a ****ing caveman!
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jan 2007
            • 2397
            • 257
            • 37
            • 10,151

            #95
            Originally posted by global_analyst
            PBF ran???......please explain. PBF to me put his skills to use, it is not like the ring is the size of a football feild, it is not his fault either that baldo could not hit him, it is not his fault that he used the ring size with his skills to beat Baldo. that fight in years to come when analyzed properly will highlight the the skill level in which PBF used to beat the undisputed champion at 147. Words like "ran" is just crude attempts to take away the level at which he operated that night.
            PBF did what he had to do to win effectively. So did Hatton. If you've seen his career beyond the last couple of fights, you'll realise that he is not as much of a clincher as people make out. Both are spoiling tactics in order to frustrate their opponents and both are not what the fans want to see. Why is one okay and the other isnt?

            Originally posted by BigDog9
            man hatton hasnt fought hanyone good yet form the us, no one competitive, castillo will b his test, i say. hattn isnt all that great has people say.. all he does his hold on, and u guys know it.
            I'm sorry, but your post is barely comprehensible.

            Comment

            • Hydro
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Apr 2006
              • 1673
              • 81
              • 16
              • 8,227

              #96
              Originally posted by Miksterious
              PBF did what he had to do to win effectively. So did Hatton. If you've seen his career beyond the last couple of fights, you'll realise that he is not as much of a clincher as people make out. Both are spoiling tactics in order to frustrate their opponents and both are not what the fans want to see. Why is one okay and the other isnt?
              One is legal and the other is not.

              The problem with Hatton's style is that it's become a pattern in his last few fights. Not that it makes him less of a fighter in terms of his ranking or anything like that, it's just painful to watch.

              Comment

              • global_analyst
                Up and Comer
                • Jan 2007
                • 54
                • 3
                • 0
                • 6,078

                #97
                Originally posted by Miksterious
                PBF did what he had to do to win effectively. So did Hatton. If you've seen his career beyond the last couple of fights, you'll realise that he is not as much of a clincher as people make out. Both are spoiling tactics in order to frustrate their opponents and both are not what the fans want to see. Why is one okay and the other isnt?



                I'm sorry, but your post is barely comprehensible.
                If ur post was aimed at me, i have never critised hatton's performance, i dont play the double standard shyt

                Comment

                • bigtime9
                  Banned
                  • May 2006
                  • 473
                  • 137
                  • 0
                  • 538

                  #98
                  hatton is a bum..he has no defense and little pop in his offense. any elite fighter would demolish him.

                  Comment

                  • .Mik.
                    I'm a ****ing caveman!
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jan 2007
                    • 2397
                    • 257
                    • 37
                    • 10,151

                    #99
                    Originally posted by global_analyst
                    If ur post was aimed at me, i have never critised hatton's performance, i dont play the double standard shyt
                    I was using your post to address the opinions of many of the morons who post on here. The 'Hugman Hatton' and 'Hatton would get knocked out by any decent fighter, he's got no skills, all he can do is hug' crowd.

                    Comment

                    • hugh grant
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Apr 2006
                      • 30528
                      • 2,196
                      • 920
                      • 105,596

                      #100
                      Originally posted by bigtime9
                      hatton is a bum..he has no defense and little pop in his offense. any elite fighter would demolish him.
                      If he hasnt a defense why is he not losing? He must have the greatest chin in the world or something or do you mean he has amazing reflexes and relies on his reflexes to avoid getting hit?
                      By elite do you mean someone like Cotto and PBF and Margarito and Witter?.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP