Should i give a **** about the heavyweight division??

[wmute]

and lewis was knocked out twice in only 30 something fights

wrong
twice in 40 fights, and in his entire career

also:

he rematched and ****d both fighters

tell me about wlad's vengeance...

[wmute]

excuses? did you not watch those 3 fights? and who said he didnt have 3 losses? he also has 47 wins and 42 ko's

nope i missed the purrity one

i will make myself clear:

for whatever reasons those THREE KO happened, they happened

a fluke is something happening ONCE, not THREE TIMES

[beez721]

nope i missed the purrity one

i will make myself clear:

for whatever reasons those THREE KO happened, they happened

a fluke is something happening ONCE, not THREE TIMES

3 flukes can happen over as large a span as 50 fights. in wlds case 2 of the three were flukes. end of story

[.::|ULTIMATE|::.]

Nope the lower weight classes is where its at.

[medium-deek]

All the real talent and exciting fights are in the lower weights. SMW, 140, 147. Thats were all the fun is at. The heavyweight has never interested me much at all.

[wmute]

3 flukes can happen over as large a span as 50 fights. in wlds case 2 of the three were flukes. end of story

yeah right

like manuel augustus: 28 robberies/fights accepted on short notice/flukes and so on...

give me a break

[beez721]

yeah right

like manuel augustus: 28 robberies/fights accepted on short notice/flukes and so on...

give me a break

uh,,,,no sir,,,,not like augustus and 28 robberies or short notice and so on?

[wmute]

uh,,,,no sir,,,,not like augustus and 28 robberies or short notice and so on?

look

go on watching heavyweights, go on hugging whoever's nuts you want, I could not care less.

I cannot stop you from thinking a fighter with 3 KO losses (to Purrity, Sanders, Brewster) would hold a belt for long in a division which included Lewis, Bowe, Tyson, Tua, Golota, Ibeabuchi, Holyfield.

You are happy with that opinion, be happy!

bye

[beez721]

look

go on watching heavyweights, go on hugging whoever's nuts you want, I could not care less.

I cannot stop you from thinking a fighter with 3 KO losses (to Purrity, Sanders, Brewster) would hold a belt for long in a division which included Lewis, Bowe, Tyson, Tua, Golota, Ibeabuchi, Holyfield.

You are happy with that opinion, be happy!

bye

lol,,,of course anyone with an opinion that dare be postitive about a klit is a hugger, you just proved yourself a hater by those statements. wlad was only beaten 3 times in a span of 50 fights and 2 out of the 3 were flukes,,,period! . he'd have competed in any era. end of story. good night!

[wmute]

lol,,,of course anyone with an opinion that dare be postitive about a klit is a hugger, you just proved yourself a hater by those statements. wlad was only beaten 3 times in a span of 50 fights and 2 out of the 3 were flukes,,,period! . he'd have competed in any era. end of story. good night!

anyone blindly believing that THREE KOS dont matter is a nuthugger.

I dont hate any fighter, I just dont watch these heavys, because i dont like watching them, I have something "bad" to say about all of them from peter to briggs to wlad. (I do NOT like watching Vitali style AT ALL, but he was the best of the current bunch IMO). the only difference among them is that wlad has an entire tribe of huggers, like you.

also i would add that I am very respectful of the Klits being educated, polite and well spoken individuals.

go on putting ****** smilies in your posts, and ask yourself the following questions.

why among all the fighters from the 90s I mentioned, NO ONE had THREE KO LOSSES (to a journeyman and two fighters which can optimistically be described as good) in their youth? why NO ONE gassed out/underestimated his opponent chin/got caught THREE times?