Tweet
Compubox gave round 2 an 11-6 score in favor of floyd
As the author proves Pac had a solid 17 connected shot which clearly landed while, compubox only gave 6 in total. Far cry from the truth.
That said, I needed to answer Andreward's arguments.
Andreward's First argument debunked. Score still remains 17-9 Pac
@ 5:30 - Pac landed a solid left to the body which the author clearly says it had a thudding sound.
For better review @ 5:18 better view of the same action shows the exchange clearer. Pac lunges with a left that hits Floyd shoulder (even if it did hit the author did not count it) then Floyd fires a check hook that graces at the side temple that shows it was more of a gracing push than a punch which obviously wasn't a scoring blow as I do agree with the author.
Then Pac follows up with a stiff left to the body which the author wasn't sure that it landed. So he didn't score it, but the Third shot Pac did land a lunging right hand to Floyd's head then after that Floyd counters with his check hook that graced pac's head which more of a push than a scoring blow. (The thudding sound was a dead giveaway Pac obviously landed to Floyd's chin when he fired that lunging right)
The sequence was Pac fired a right jab to the shoulder, followed by a stiff left to the body, then fires a lunging right to Floyd's chin easily showing the thudding sound came from pac's since the thudding sound happened before Floyd's check hook.
Pac's all 3 shots actually landed, but the author was generous to Floyd so he only gave Pac 1 shot from that 3 punch sequence pac did. So giving 1 point for Pac was more than fair.
Andreward's 2nd argument debunked -Score still remains 17-9 Pac
@ 7:40 - illegal blows to the side doesn't count while clinched buddy. This is pro boxing not the amateurs. Those 4 shots are couldn't hurt a fly, no leverage means no effect, means weak and not scoring blows. This shot are like child like desperate shots to frustrate don't fool yourself those are lame punches my friend. This Is the hurt biz. that isn't a scoring blow.
In addition, Pac has no problem with Bayless doesnt mean what Bayless did was good refereeing that night. as a result. The irony is Pac couldn't do more because of too much allowed clinches by Bayless hence, Pac with all the diffusing exercise of floyd's clinching and running while Pac chased till the marathon event was over, in the end Pac still found away to score.
Andreward's 3rd argument debunked - Score still remains 17-9 Pac
Regarding the orbital bone you're complaining about. It was a gracing shot to pac's orbital Bone but the author clearly said he scored it for Floyd. So what's the problem?
@ 9:15 pac's right foot was planted firmly on he ground and still had leverage when he fired a 4 punch combo. The left to the body didn't land clean, then @ 9:17 a very short right hand to the chin of Floyd, followed up by a left hook to the temple then @ 9:20 a right hook to the chin of Floyd.
His argument was if your going to score that weak gracing shot by Floyd when his jab graced pac's orbital bone. You should obviously score those shots Pac landed it was more Than a gracing shots it even landed cleanly to Floyd' head 3 times and the other one was a chin check to boot. As the author says it wasn't great shots but at least Pacquiao gets the chin here an there. Easy 3 points for Pac.
Andreward's 4th argument debunked -Score still remains 17-9 Pac
@ 10:20 --- 3 punches in the clinch position. As I said these have no leverage. No bite. Lame weak punches. Not scoring blows. This is not the amateurs this is not the hurt business. Those punches don't hurt lol
Andreward's 5th argument debunked - Score still remains 17-9 Pac
@ 10:29 - you say the author didn't score Floyd's right straight, but he did @ 10:23 the scores were 9-6, then after Their tit for tat exchange it became 10-7. So both lands, nothing to complain about.
Andreward's 6th argument debunked - Score still remains 17-9 Pac
@ 10:37 - no score were given to Pac that time. Must be your hallucinations. The point he gave was @ 10:41 Pac slips a right hand to the body which it clearly did land.
Andreward's 7th argument debunked - Score still remains 17-9 Pac
@ 11:06 - lol Floyd pushes Pac. My gosh! That is not a scoring blow. Do you really know boxing? Really?
Andreward's 8th argument debunked - Score still remains 17-9 Pac
@ 11:25 the score was 15-9 then at 11:31 it was 17-9, the 2 landed Pac shots are here, the first connect shot is @ 11:26 a chin shot and @ 11:30 a short stiff left jab to the chest before Floyd grabs Pac for dear life, thus giving Pac those clear 2 shots.
Sigh.. Nice try.. All disputed. That's just round 2. Score remains @ 17-9. Pac the clear winner.
You can see the dominance of Floyd is merely an illusion. Pac was in the driver seat the whole 2nd round. Pac convincingly won round 2 , 17-9.
As the author proves Pac had a solid 17 connected shot which clearly landed while, compubox only gave 6 in total. Far cry from the truth.
That said, I needed to answer Andreward's arguments.
Andreward's First argument debunked. Score still remains 17-9 Pac
@ 5:30 - Pac landed a solid left to the body which the author clearly says it had a thudding sound.
For better review @ 5:18 better view of the same action shows the exchange clearer. Pac lunges with a left that hits Floyd shoulder (even if it did hit the author did not count it) then Floyd fires a check hook that graces at the side temple that shows it was more of a gracing push than a punch which obviously wasn't a scoring blow as I do agree with the author.
Then Pac follows up with a stiff left to the body which the author wasn't sure that it landed. So he didn't score it, but the Third shot Pac did land a lunging right hand to Floyd's head then after that Floyd counters with his check hook that graced pac's head which more of a push than a scoring blow. (The thudding sound was a dead giveaway Pac obviously landed to Floyd's chin when he fired that lunging right)
The sequence was Pac fired a right jab to the shoulder, followed by a stiff left to the body, then fires a lunging right to Floyd's chin easily showing the thudding sound came from pac's since the thudding sound happened before Floyd's check hook.
Pac's all 3 shots actually landed, but the author was generous to Floyd so he only gave Pac 1 shot from that 3 punch sequence pac did. So giving 1 point for Pac was more than fair.
Andreward's 2nd argument debunked -Score still remains 17-9 Pac
@ 7:40 - illegal blows to the side doesn't count while clinched buddy. This is pro boxing not the amateurs. Those 4 shots are couldn't hurt a fly, no leverage means no effect, means weak and not scoring blows. This shot are like child like desperate shots to frustrate don't fool yourself those are lame punches my friend. This Is the hurt biz. that isn't a scoring blow.
In addition, Pac has no problem with Bayless doesnt mean what Bayless did was good refereeing that night. as a result. The irony is Pac couldn't do more because of too much allowed clinches by Bayless hence, Pac with all the diffusing exercise of floyd's clinching and running while Pac chased till the marathon event was over, in the end Pac still found away to score.
Andreward's 3rd argument debunked - Score still remains 17-9 Pac
Regarding the orbital bone you're complaining about. It was a gracing shot to pac's orbital Bone but the author clearly said he scored it for Floyd. So what's the problem?
@ 9:15 pac's right foot was planted firmly on he ground and still had leverage when he fired a 4 punch combo. The left to the body didn't land clean, then @ 9:17 a very short right hand to the chin of Floyd, followed up by a left hook to the temple then @ 9:20 a right hook to the chin of Floyd.
His argument was if your going to score that weak gracing shot by Floyd when his jab graced pac's orbital bone. You should obviously score those shots Pac landed it was more Than a gracing shots it even landed cleanly to Floyd' head 3 times and the other one was a chin check to boot. As the author says it wasn't great shots but at least Pacquiao gets the chin here an there. Easy 3 points for Pac.
Andreward's 4th argument debunked -Score still remains 17-9 Pac
@ 10:20 --- 3 punches in the clinch position. As I said these have no leverage. No bite. Lame weak punches. Not scoring blows. This is not the amateurs this is not the hurt business. Those punches don't hurt lol
Andreward's 5th argument debunked - Score still remains 17-9 Pac
@ 10:29 - you say the author didn't score Floyd's right straight, but he did @ 10:23 the scores were 9-6, then after Their tit for tat exchange it became 10-7. So both lands, nothing to complain about.
Andreward's 6th argument debunked - Score still remains 17-9 Pac
@ 10:37 - no score were given to Pac that time. Must be your hallucinations. The point he gave was @ 10:41 Pac slips a right hand to the body which it clearly did land.
Andreward's 7th argument debunked - Score still remains 17-9 Pac
@ 11:06 - lol Floyd pushes Pac. My gosh! That is not a scoring blow. Do you really know boxing? Really?
Andreward's 8th argument debunked - Score still remains 17-9 Pac
@ 11:25 the score was 15-9 then at 11:31 it was 17-9, the 2 landed Pac shots are here, the first connect shot is @ 11:26 a chin shot and @ 11:30 a short stiff left jab to the chest before Floyd grabs Pac for dear life, thus giving Pac those clear 2 shots.
Sigh.. Nice try.. All disputed. That's just round 2. Score remains @ 17-9. Pac the clear winner.
You can see the dominance of Floyd is merely an illusion. Pac was in the driver seat the whole 2nd round. Pac convincingly won round 2 , 17-9.
Comment