Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Hamed wasn't dominated by Barrera IMO

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Hamed wasn't dominated by Barrera IMO

    ~ referee: Joe Cortez | judge: Chuck Giampa 111-116 | judge: Patricia Morse Jarman 112-115 | judge: Duane Ford 112-115 ~

    thats hardly a dominating performance IMO. 3 points on 2 judges cards.... Don't forget Naz did hardly any training whatsoever and just chilled while Barrera was apparently training in a place with no civiliaztion! sure naz was an *******, even when he tryed to praise his opponents, but he was one of britans best boxers.

  • #2
    Originally posted by Oriachim View Post
    ~ referee: Joe Cortez | judge: Chuck Giampa 111-116 | judge: Patricia Morse Jarman 112-115 | judge: Duane Ford 112-115 ~

    thats hardly a dominating performance IMO. 3 points on 2 judges cards.... Don't forget Naz did hardly any training whatsoever and just chilled while Barrera was apparently training in a place with no civiliaztion! sure naz was an *******, even when he tryed to praise his opponents, but he was one of britans best boxers.
    nah he got dominated, he was a punching bag the entire fight

    Comment


    • #3
      He was Marcos ***** all night long and it was sweet

      Comment


      • #4
        He was dominated from that start. Truth hurts I kno.

        Comment


        • #5
          I don't think it was as one-sided as some make out. The problem was whenever Hamed got caught his balance was so poor he invariably ended up looking like a booze-sozzled geriatric staggering around at a wedding reception.

          Combine the above with the fact that he had become obsessed with the one-punch knockout (probably because he couldn't manage anything more energetic once he chose not to bother training seriosly) and it all went pretty sour.

          Not a whitewash. But not a close decision by any stretch of the imagination.

          Comment


          • #6
            No way was he dominated, its just that people like to think he was. Some people will have you belive he was knocked out!! lol

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by them_apples View Post
              nah he got dominated, he was a punching bag the entire fight
              In the 10th round? What about the cagey opening rounds. I think he won at least 2-3 rounds. He got outboxed but he was no punching bag like fatman V Floyd. It was not complete physical rape, but a chess match annihilation. If he was getting raped and got smashed all over he would have got KTFO like a typical english bum, which he is not!

              He lost a chess match and got picked off. The fight was a huge event but it was a snails pace cagey fight, in which case what you said happened could not possibly have happened! In punching bag scnearios alot of punches are thrown and landed. Barrera was not stupid and knew you couldnot fight Naz or you get knocked the **** OUT! He eveen said afterwards, I didn't step in when he was wobbly like dumb K Kelly coz that is when the wounded tiger took out loadsa bad mans.
              Last edited by JulioCesaChavez; 11-22-2008, 07:13 PM.

              Comment


              • #8
                barerra lost a point in the 12th so it was really an 8-4.....clear decision.....

                Comment


                • #9
                  couldnt even knock naz down

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Barrerra clearly won the fight but he didnt "dominate" Naz like people say.

                    Naz was supposed to win the fight and KO Barrerra. He talked so much **** pre-fight which is why people act like he put on a worse performance than he really did...

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP