Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Hamed wasn't dominated by Barrera IMO

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Hamed wasn't dominated by Barrera IMO

    ~ referee: Joe Cortez | judge: Chuck Giampa 111-116 | judge: Patricia Morse Jarman 112-115 | judge: Duane Ford 112-115 ~

    thats hardly a dominating performance IMO. 3 points on 2 judges cards.... Don't forget Naz did hardly any training whatsoever and just chilled while Barrera was apparently training in a place with no civiliaztion! sure naz was an *******, even when he tryed to praise his opponents, but he was one of britans best boxers.

  • #2
    Originally posted by Oriachim View Post
    ~ referee: Joe Cortez | judge: Chuck Giampa 111-116 | judge: Patricia Morse Jarman 112-115 | judge: Duane Ford 112-115 ~

    thats hardly a dominating performance IMO. 3 points on 2 judges cards.... Don't forget Naz did hardly any training whatsoever and just chilled while Barrera was apparently training in a place with no civiliaztion! sure naz was an *******, even when he tryed to praise his opponents, but he was one of britans best boxers.
    nah he got dominated, he was a punching bag the entire fight

    Comment


    • #3
      He was Marcos ***** all night long and it was sweet

      Comment


      • #4
        He was dominated from that start. Truth hurts I kno.

        Comment


        • #5
          I don't think it was as one-sided as some make out. The problem was whenever Hamed got caught his balance was so poor he invariably ended up looking like a booze-sozzled geriatric staggering around at a wedding reception.

          Combine the above with the fact that he had become obsessed with the one-punch knockout (probably because he couldn't manage anything more energetic once he chose not to bother training seriosly) and it all went pretty sour.

          Not a whitewash. But not a close decision by any stretch of the imagination.

          Comment


          • #6
            No way was he dominated, its just that people like to think he was. Some people will have you belive he was knocked out!! lol

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by them_apples View Post
              nah he got dominated, he was a punching bag the entire fight
              In the 10th round? What about the cagey opening rounds. I think he won at least 2-3 rounds. He got outboxed but he was no punching bag like fatman V Floyd. It was not complete physical ****, but a chess match annihilation. If he was getting ****d and got smashed all over he would have got KTFO like a typical english bum, which he is not!

              He lost a chess match and got picked off. The fight was a huge event but it was a snails pace cagey fight, in which case what you said happened could not possibly have happened! In punching bag scnearios alot of punches are thrown and landed. Barrera was not ****** and knew you couldnot fight Naz or you get knocked the **** OUT! He eveen said afterwards, I didn't step in when he was wobbly like dumb K Kelly coz that is when the wounded tiger took out loadsa bad mans.
              Last edited by JulioCesaChavez; 11-22-2008, 07:13 PM.

              Comment


              • #8
                barerra lost a point in the 12th so it was really an 8-4.....clear decision.....

                Comment


                • #9
                  couldnt even knock naz down

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Barrerra clearly won the fight but he didnt "dominate" Naz like people say.

                    Naz was supposed to win the fight and KO Barrerra. He talked so much **** pre-fight which is why people act like he put on a worse performance than he really did...

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP