Buy or Sell: Drawing the Color Line

[travestyny]

- - You sold off any gravitas on this subject a long time ago with various permutations of cartoon history you made up.

I haven't seen you dispute anything. All you did was make the mistake of telling me where you live so I could easily prove to you that the same shlt happened there that happened all over America. You dummy


I guess CRT is still undefeated

[QueensburyRules]

I haven't seen you dispute anything. All you did was make the mistake of telling me where you live so I could easily prove to you that the same shlt happened there that happened all over America. You dummy


I guess CRT is still undefeated

- - Can't even define crt and can't even come up with a 3rd millennium example of American federal regulations discriminatory against black folk.

I provided sourced book examples, but looks like U playing U can't read card.

[travestyny]

- - Can't even define crt and can't even come up with a 3rd millennium example of American federal regulations discriminatory against black folk.

I provided sourced book examples, but looks like U playing U can't read card.

I know you can't define CRT.

If you want to know how CRT is still relevant, look at the links I just sent you.

Matter of fact, here they are again. Have fun.

How Redlining STILL hurts Black and Latino Students in Public Schools

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opini...mn/6083342002/

Do you know what "still" means?

How about this?

Black men sentenced to more time for committing the exact same crime as a white person, study finds
2012

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...n-study-finds/

Got that?

And this...

Modern Day Redlining: Banks Discriminate in lending

For people of color, banks are shutting the door to homeownership

Fifty years after the federal Fair Housing Act banned racial discrimination in lending, African Americans and Latinos continue to be routinely denied conventional mortgage loans at rates far higher than their white counterparts.

This modern-day redlining persisted in 61 metro areas even when controlling for applicants’ income, loan amount and neighborhood, according to a mountain of Home Mortgage Disclosure Act records analyzed by Reveal from The Center for Investigative Reporting.

https://revealnews.org/article/for-p...homeownership/

How about this...

Freddie Mac Finds ‘Pervasive’ Bias in Home Appraisal Industry


A new study augments a body of evidence that homes in Black and Latino neighborhoods are undervalued.
Examining housing appraisals from Jan. 1, 2015 to Dec. 31, 2021

https://www.vhfa.org/news/blog/study...ome-appraisals

And this....

Racial Double Standard in Drug Laws Persists Today

The Crack vs. Heroin Project found that racial disparities rooted in the 1980s campaign against crack ******* still persist today despite more compassionate rhetoric about the opioid crisis.

https://eji.org/news/racial-double-s...ersists-today/

[travestyny]

I provided sourced book examples, but looks like U playing U can't read card.

You didn't provide anything. Sourced book examples????

I think you need visual aids about Austin. Here you go.

[QueensburyRules]

- - Son, I told you, I live in historic South Austin that was ALWAYS integrated according to the demographics of the day before the city annexed us.

The city proper was largely integrated from most of it's inception until the 30s when they segregated the people into white, brown, and black districts. We were never part of that, and anyone north of us could live anywhere in our neighborhoods.

Subsidized housing for black folks in what became the projects was a step up until it wasn't because they were segregating the poor black folk from the middle class/well to do black folk.

U cite federal school stats to make illicit CRT points without citing any regulations to prove your point. Never heared of subsidized suburbs, but what municipalities and States do is offer businesses tax incentives to relocate that sparks housing booms that are strictly developer generated, though today the local govt offers subsidies to build the new projects for affordable housing, ie mass scale apartment units where "affordable" units are built with "regular" units.

I suggest you drop CRT here. I don't like to see threads locked.

Boxing has traditionally existed one on one white vs black vs brown vs ***, vs Catholic, vs Protestant vs big vs small and so on, and sadly sometimes outside politics interfere in matchs as we have discussed ad infinitum.

- - Sourced yet again for Teensy, or is it weensy now?

Need to stop using U sources aping what I already schooled U on. At any point in time even before we became South Austin anyone could move south of the river into our neighborhoods who were part of the rural mail route then. I still have my old mailbox dating back to the 30-40s.

[travestyny]

- - Sourced yet again for Teensy, or is it weensy now?

Need to stop using U sources aping what I already schooled U on. At any point in time even before we became South Austin anyone could move south of the river into our neighborhoods who were part of the rural mail route then. I still have my old mailbox dating back to the 30-40s.

Sourced with no source, huh? You're more of an idiot than I thought. You didn't post any of this until I already exposed you.

Do you see where it says racial covenants? You lose again, Queenie.

https://projects.statesman.com/news/economic-mobility/
uDCt1F.png

[travestyny]

- - You sold off any gravitas on this subject a long time ago with various permutations of cartoon history you made up.

Here is your Austin with its racial covenants. Proof right in your face. Now that's what was going on, right?

[travestyny]

We were never part of that, and anyone north of us could live anywhere in our neighborhoods.

You can't go much farther North than this Northern section of Austin, where there were racial covenants. You got that now? You're still a failure.

[Willie Pep 229]

Here is your Austin with its racial covenants. Proof right in your face. Now that's what was going on, right?

I am not challenging that Austin was segregated by law - I suspect it was.

But in the regulations posted above it starts with clause #8. In clause eight it states 'no property in 'said addition.' - What does 'Said addition' mean?

I notice the last line of what looks to be clause #7 speaks of 'servant quarters' - is it possible this restriction of African American ownership applies to the previous mentioned servant quarters? As in they didn't want black entrepreneurs to buy up these 'said additions' and become landlords over the black domestic help housed in these lots?

Would like to see clauses #1 through #7 to get the complete picture.

The reference 'said additions' is vauge. It doesn't say home ownership. What are the said additions?

[QueensburyRules]

You can't go much farther North than this Northern section of Austin, where there were racial covenants. You got that now? You're still a failure.

- - Have regressed to 2 yrs of age now?

I stated that anyone north of us could live in our neighborhoods however few they were then, ie what would become South Austin after we were incorporated into the City.

If you're a lawyer as you implied, you're a guaranteed loss in court.