Enclosed are my top 15 ranked heavyweights by 20-year intervals. The criteria for the

[JAB5239]

- -U equivocating facts ain't factual.

https://boxrec.com/media/index.php/T..._Ratings:_1976

The Ring Magazine's Annual Ratings: 1976

[travestyny]

Stop trying to take away from the FACT you falsely claimed George and Larry were never ranked at the same time. No amount of blabbering gibberish is going to change that. Nothing else matters except the fact they were indeed ranked in the top 10 together, at the same time, after you wrongly claimed something yet again. Get over yourself, ya old rummy.

I've also wondered if the guy is really just a troll. Three posters have now chimed in that he's wrong, yet he keeps going.

Either way, he's pathetic.

[JAB5239]

I've also wondered if the guy is really just a troll. Three posters have now chimed in that he's wrong, yet he keeps going.

Either way, he's pathetic.

3? Stop low balling him. Kickball has had many, many more people call him a troll than that!

[QueensburyRules]

The Ring Magazine's Annual Ratings: 1976

- -As selected in March of 77 by which time George already retired.

Not my fault U and Ring were math illiterate.

U want a link, I give link, and U cartoonishly too toopid to understand it.

[Nash out]

Couldn't be bothered to read it all, but scrolled to the bottom and that list is hilarious. If that's what you were going for, well done. If not, then quite a waste of time writing that.

[QueensburyRules]

Stop trying to take away from the FACT you falsely claimed George and Larry were never ranked at the same time. No amount of blabbering gibberish is going to change that. Nothing else matters except the fact they were indeed ranked in the top 10 together, at the same time, after you wrongly claimed something yet again. Get over yourself, ya old rummy.

- -Except that George was retired by the time the 76 ratings were selected. Take it up with U fellow dummies at Ring, half of which are deep six by now.

[Dr. Z]

- -As selected in March of 77 by which time George already retired.

Not my fault U and Ring were math illiterate.

U want a link, I give link, and U cartoonishly too toopid to understand it.

Hold on now. Jab5239 is correct.

Foreman fought in March 17th, 1977 losing to Jimmy Young on points. The Ring Magazine Annual Ratings article came out March 1 1977, written while Foreman was active.

[QueensburyRules]

Hold on now. Jab5239 is correct.

Foreman fought in March 17th, 1977 losing to Jimmy Young on points. The Ring Magazine Annual Ratings article came out March 1 1977, written while Foreman was active.

- -No date other than March 77 given, ie George retired.

U Quack X?

How many dumbos can slobber on the head of a pinhead?

[Dr. Z]

- -No date other than March 77 given, ie George retired.

U Quack X?

How many dumbos can slobber on the head of a pinhead?

My point was the Ring Magazine article came out before Foreman lost to Young, hence he was active at the time.

I'm new but it seems you have issues with lots of posters here, so I'm going to do myself a favor and opt out of replying back to you in this thread.

[JAB5239]

My point was the Ring Magazine article came out before Foreman lost to Young, hence he was active at the time.

I'm new but it seems you have issues with lots of posters here, so I'm going to do myself a favor and opt out of replying back to you in this thread.

She knows. She doesn't want to admit to being wrong. In the grand scheme of things it's no big deal, but some of us get tired of the nonsensical misinformation being thrown around to suit an agenda.